EPL Index
·5. Januar 2026
Journalist honest about options for wantaway Chelsea star

In partnership with
Yahoo sportsEPL Index
·5. Januar 2026

Raheem Sterling’s Chelsea career has drifted into an uncomfortable holding pattern, one that now looks close to resolution. The winger, once recruited to add pedigree and authority to a youthful squad, has not played a single minute this season. Left out of Chelsea’s Premier League squad after returning from a loan spell at Arsenal, Sterling has become emblematic of a transfer strategy that promised certainty but delivered friction.

Photo IMAGO
Chelsea are expected to tread cautiously in the January window, yet Sterling’s situation demands clarity. At 31, and with his England ambitions still flickering, inactivity is not an option. What once appeared a temporary impasse has evolved into a decisive moment for both player and club.
For months, Sterling’s preference was clear. London suited his family, his routine, and his sense of stability. Links to Fulham and West Ham reflected that thinking, familiar surroundings offering a softer landing. However, those options have not progressed, prompting a reassessment.
According to journalist Sami Mokbel, Sterling has broadened his horizons and is now prepared to leave the capital altogether, provided the move offers permanence rather than another short term fix.
He said: “Chelsea attacker Raheem Sterling open to moving away from London amid links with West Ham and Fulham. Sterling settled in the capital but if conditions are attractive and offers his career and family stability, he is willing to uproot. Player wants permanent switch, no loan.”
That insistence on a permanent move is significant. Sterling wants certainty, not another holding pattern, and Chelsea equally want finality.
Sterling remains Chelsea’s highest paid player, a legacy of an earlier era under Todd Boehly when marquee names were secured with commanding contracts. Removing that salary from the wage bill would offer flexibility, both financially and symbolically.
Chelsea’s current recruitment model is more restrained, prioritising age profiles and sustainability over star power. Sterling’s deal sits awkwardly within that framework, and his limited impact since arriving in 2022 has sharpened the desire to move on.
This is not personal, it is structural. Chelsea have cooled their interest in high cost attackers and are wary of repeating past mistakes.
Sterling was among the first major arrivals of the Boehly ownership, intended to bring leadership to a young dressing room. Instead, his tenure has coincided with upheaval, managerial churn, and shifting priorities.
The lessons have been absorbed. Chelsea are no longer offering elite level wages as standard, even when linked with players such as Michael Olise or Victor Osimhen, both of whom ultimately chose other paths.
For Sterling, that recalibration leaves him surplus to requirements. For Chelsea, his departure would close a chapter that has influenced every transfer decision since. The next move, for both parties, needs to be decisive.









































