Papo na Colina
·19 June 2026
Cazé TV v Globo: who's winning the 2026 World Cup ratings?

In partnership with
Yahoo sportsPapo na Colina
·19 June 2026

The 2026 World Cup has pitted two completely different broadcasting models against each other — and the result has split opinion over who is really “winning” the tournament’s audience. On one side is Globo, with more than 70 years of tradition and Ibope’s established ratings metric. On the other is Cazé TV, streaming all 104 matches for free on YouTube and breaking the platform’s world records. So, who’s ahead?
The answer depends on what question you’re asking.
By traditional television numbers, Globo remains the clear leader. In Brazil’s opening match against Morocco, the network posted 32 points on the National Television Panel (PNT), which measures the country’s 15 main markets — the highest rating for that time slot in seven years. In Rio de Janeiro, viewership reached 34 points, and in São Paulo, 31 points, the network’s best Saturday performance in six years.
Each Ibope point in Greater São Paulo represents nearly 200,000 people. In other words, in absolute TV numbers, Globo continues to dominate the Brazilian audience — more than half of the households with a TV on during the match were tuned to the channel.
SBT, which also broadcasts some matches with Galvão Bueno on commentary, is a distant second among free-to-air networks, with around 8 points in São Paulo for the same match — still its best result of the year.
Meanwhile, in digital, it’s a different story. Cazé TV’s broadcast of Brazil vs. Morocco surpassed 12 million concurrent viewers on YouTube, breaking the platform’s world record for simultaneous viewership — even surpassing the livestream of the Indian Chandrayaan-3 probe landing on the Moon, which had 8 million.
Casimiro Miguel’s channel holds the rights to broadcast all 104 World Cup matches in Brazil, something no single free-to-air broadcaster has managed to do, and it already has more than 30 million subscribers on the platform.
Here is the key point that many people ignore when trying to declare a “winner”: the two metrics do not measure the same thing, using the same yardstick.
Ibope measures ratings points in specific markets (such as Greater São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro), with audited methodology and statistical sampling, calculating how many households have their TV set tuned to that channel. YouTube numbers, tracked by companies such as Playboard, count concurrent accesses across the entire country — and even internationally — without the same type of auditing.
This means that comparing “32 Ibope points” with “12 million viewers on YouTube” is, technically, like comparing apples and oranges. They are audiences measured by different systems, with different geographic reach and different counting methods.
If the question is about tradition, established nationwide reach, and the official metric of the TV advertising market, Globo is still ahead, and by a wide margin — it is still the broadcaster that concentrates the country’s largest simultaneous audience in audited numbers.
If the question is about who is reshaping football consumption in Brazil, especially among younger audiences, the answer points to Cazé TV. The channel not only broke YouTube’s world record but also secured the exclusive right to broadcast every World Cup match — something unprecedented for an operation born in streaming.
In practice, what the 2026 World Cup is showing is not that one side has “beaten” the other, but that the Brazilian audience has split between two viewing habits that have grown in parallel: those sitting in the living room watching traditional TV, and those watching on their phone or smart TV through YouTube, following the match with live chat and Casimiro’s commentary.
The question worth asking is not “who won,” but how far this battle will go in redefining how Brazilians watch football after the World Cup ends.
+ Follow Papo na Colina on social media: Thread, Bluesky, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok and Google News.
This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇧🇷 here.







































