CMTV controversy: pundit calls FC Porto a fourth division side after draw | OneFootball

CMTV controversy: pundit calls FC Porto a fourth division side after draw | OneFootball

In partnership with

Yahoo sports
Icon: Portal dos Dragões

Portal dos Dragões

·23 February 2026

CMTV controversy: pundit calls FC Porto a fourth division side after draw

Article image:CMTV controversy: pundit calls FC Porto a fourth division side after draw

The television broadcast of the match between FC Porto and Rio Ave was marked by a controversial statement from a CMTV commentator, made in the final moments when the Dragons were leading 1-0 and trying to control their advantage.

As the match entered stoppage time, the comment took many FC Porto fans by surprise due to the disparaging tone used live on air.


OneFootball Videos


“Porto looks, like, a 4th Division team playing at Real Madrid’s ground and wasting time,” said the commentator.

Earlier, the same member of the broadcast had criticized the pace of the match, noting that between “falls, shoves, theatrics, and throw-ins along the sideline,” there had been almost no actual play during that phase.

Managing the result or gratuitous provocation?

The situation occurred in a clear context: FC Porto held a narrow lead with only a few minutes left to secure three important points, choosing to slow the pace and reduce risks in a decisive phase—a common practice in tightly contested matches.

Even so, the comparison to a lower division team was received by many supporters as disrespectful and exaggerated, especially considering Porto’s dominance during several moments of the game.

Another controversial episode

This comment adds to other recent episodes in which television analyses and commentary have sparked controversy among the blue and white fans, who frequently accuse the media of applying double standards in their coverage of FC Porto.

In the end, the result stood: a 1-0 victory for the Dragons, with three points secured, despite the noise generated off the pitch.

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇵🇹 here.

View publisher imprint