Did Everton deserve a penalty for that Saliba tackle?

In partnership with

Just Arsenal News

·22 December 2025

Did Everton deserve a penalty for that Saliba tackle?

William Saliba was fortunate to avoid a red card during Arsenal’s victory at Everton over the weekend, but debate has centred on whether the defender should have conceded a penalty. The Frenchman challenged for the ball with a high foot, an action that many felt could easily have resulted in a dismissal. The referee, however, interpreted the incident differently and allowed play to continue, a decision that was met with frustration from Everton players and supporters.

The incident has sparked widespread discussion in the media, with some observers suggesting that the challenge might have been judged more harshly had it involved another player. Concerns over inconsistency in decision-making by VAR have added fuel to the debate, with fans questioning whether the same action would have led to a red card or penalty in a different context. As a result, Saliba can consider himself fortunate to have escaped punishment that might have prevented Arsenal from keeping a clean sheet and potentially altered the outcome of the match.

OneFootball Videos

VAR debate and referee interpretation

The discussion highlights ongoing concerns about how similar incidents are assessed across different matches. Supporters continue to call for greater clarity and consistency, particularly when marginal decisions can have a significant impact on results. In this case, the referee’s on field judgement was decisive, supported by VAR after review.

(Photo by Matt McNulty/Getty Images)

Expert opinion on the incident

Former FIFA referee Keith Hackett has offered his assessment of the challenge, speaking according to Football Insider. He said, “The player played the ball. It was there to win. There’s no malice or excessive force, so I don’t believe it was a penalty.

“Football is a contact sport, and this is where you have to have balance. The referee is in a good position, he’s got a good view. VAR has that second view as well. When I saw it, there was a general view that it might be a penalty.

“But when I really examined it on several occasions, I think it would have been really harsh. Both players were just playing football and going for the ball.”

Hackett’s comments emphasise the importance of context and balance in officiating. While opinions remain divided, his explanation offers insight into why the decision ultimately went in Arsenal’s favour.

______________________________________________________________________ ADMIN COMMENT

So here are some simple rules which I must insist commenters follow….

You agree not to give any personal abuse to other Arsenal fans. Everyone is allowed to hold their own opinions even if you disagree with them. It COSTS NOTHING TO BE POLITE TO OTHER ARSENAL FANS.

CALLING ALL ARSENAL FANS! Anyone who would like to contribute an Article or Video opinion piece on JustArsenal, please contact us through this link…