How Bruno Henrique’s defence overturned his ban ⚖️ | OneFootball

How Bruno Henrique’s defence overturned his ban ⚖️ | OneFootball

In partnership with

Yahoo sports
Icon: OneFootball

OneFootball

·15 November 2025

How Bruno Henrique’s defence overturned his ban ⚖️

Article image:How Bruno Henrique’s defence overturned his ban ⚖️

The forward Bruno Henrique from Flamengo was cleared to play after the STJD converted, last Thursday (13), the suspension of 12 matches, initially applied, into a fine of R$ 100,000.

Thus, the forward will be able to play this Saturday (15) against Sport, in a postponed Brasileirão match.


OneFootball Videos


The site ge explained how the forward's defense managed to overturn the punishment, something that sparked a lot of discussion on social media.

Check out the main points below, and leave your opinion in the comments!

Why was the penalty reduced?

The reversal was built on two main points raised by the defense:

  • The yellow card did not harm Flamengo. The club stated that it instructed Bruno Henrique to deliberately get the third card to "reset" the yellows before a tough sequence (Fortaleza and Palmeiras).
  • Inappropriate classification under the more severe articles of the CBJD. Most auditors understood that articles 243 and 243-A — related to match-fixing — did not apply. The conduct was considered unethical but not sufficient to characterize manipulation. Therefore, the player was punished only under article 191, which provides for a fine, not suspension.

The vote was 6 to 2 in favor of the fine, with one vote for maintaining the original penalty.

What the auditors said

  • The majority agreed that the case is different from the episodes investigated in the Maximum Penalty Operation.
  • According to the votes, Bruno Henrique's behavior is similar to precedents where the punishment was only financial.
  • There was consensus that he acted unethically, but the only applicable article would be 191.

Position of the defense and Flamengo

Lawyer Michel Assef highlighted that it was proven that Flamengo was not harmed.

The distinction between the player's case and the scheme investigated in Maximum Penalty was considered decisive in changing the outcome.

Regarding who will pay the fine, Assef stated that the responsibility lies with the athlete, but Flamengo should discuss the matter with him.

Parallel investigation in common justice

Bruno Henrique remains under investigation by the Federal Police and charged by the Public Prosecutor's Office for alleged sports fraud, an accusation based on messages from the player's brother about bets on the yellow card received against Santos in 2023.

This browser is not supported, please use a different one or install the app

video-poster

Decision repercussions

On social media, the discussion was intense about the case, with many journalists and fans sharing their opinions.

So, what did you think of the case?

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇧🇷 here.


📸 Wagner Meier - 2025 Getty Images

View publisher imprint