Journalist: Man United ‘expected to be in the market for not just one but two midfielders’ | OneFootball

Journalist: Man United ‘expected to be in the market for not just one but two midfielders’ | OneFootball

In partnership with

Yahoo sports
Icon: EPL Index

EPL Index

·4 February 2026

Journalist: Man United ‘expected to be in the market for not just one but two midfielders’

Article image:Journalist: Man United ‘expected to be in the market for not just one but two midfielders’

Manchester United’s Quiet Window and the Midfield That Still Waits

January passed at Old Trafford with barely a ripple. No new signings arrived, no late scramble for reinforcements, no sense of momentum gained or lost. As credited by The Athletic, this was a window defined by absence, and nowhere does that absence feel more significant than in midfield.

The only movement of note was Harry Amass heading on loan to Norwich City, hardly a deal that shifts the competitive dial. From a squad-building perspective, the bigger moment came off the pitch, confirmation that this will be Casemiro’s final season in Manchester. The Brazilian, earning around £350,000-a-week in Champions League seasons, will depart at the end of the campaign, a decision that “free[s] up space in United’s wage budget”.


OneFootball Videos


That line matters. Because the silence of January was less about inertia and more about anticipation.

Budget clarity and Casemiro’s closing chapter

Casemiro’s situation sits at the heart of United’s thinking. Despite “arguably playing as well and being as important as he has ever been during his three-and-a-half year spell at Old Trafford”, the club chose not to activate an extension. This was not sentimentality, it was strategy.

His exit creates room, financially and structurally, for a reset. Midfield has long felt like a collection of moments rather than a coherent plan. Casemiro’s departure makes that reset unavoidable.

Midfield depth under Carrick’s interim watch

The tactical shift under Michael Carrick from a 3-4-3 to a 4-2-3-1 has sharpened the issue. One fewer centre-back means one more midfielder, and suddenly the numbers look thin.

Article image:Journalist: Man United ‘expected to be in the market for not just one but two midfielders’

Photo IMAGO

Casemiro, Kobbie Mainoo and Manuel Ugarte are the only established options for the double pivot. As The Athletic note, “An injury to one of those three would leave United light in the middle of the park.” Two absences would mean improvisation or academy calls.

If there was a case for January action, it lived here.

Summer targets point clearly to midfield

United’s summer priorities are no secret. Carrick has said he is open to advising on a midfield rebuild, and that rebuild looks expansive. Not one signing, but two.

Elliot Anderson, Carlos Baleba and Adam Wharton are “hugely admired”, with Anderson viewed as the first-choice target. January was always unrealistic. Summer, with wages cleared and plans aligned, is when this story truly begins.


Our View – EPL Index Analysis

From a Manchester United supporter’s perspective, this report feels quietly reassuring and deeply frustrating in equal measure. Reassuring because there is finally an acceptance that midfield is the problem that must be solved, not patched. Frustrating because January once again became a month of waiting.

The Casemiro decision stands out. Letting a player leave while he is still performing well suggests clarity, not chaos. United have too often clung on for too long. Here, they have chosen timing over nostalgia. For a fan base that has watched too many contracts drift into regret, that feels like progress.

Yet the thinness of the current options is alarming. Mainoo has been outstanding but he is still young. Ugarte feels unresolved. Casemiro cannot be everywhere, and injuries are not hypothetical risks, they are certainties over a long season.

The admiration for Anderson, Baleba and Wharton is encouraging. These are not headline-grabbing galácticos but players who fit a modern midfield, energetic, press-resistant, tactically flexible. That suggests a shift in thinking, from reputation to function.

The fear, as always, is execution. Summer rebuilds sound convincing in February. They unravel in August if Champions League qualification slips or finances tighten. Borrowing again, dipping into credit facilities, all of that carries risk.

For United fans, this feels like a fork in the road. Get the midfield rebuild right and the rest can follow. Get it wrong, or delay it, and another season will drift by, full of effort, noise, and unanswered questions.

View publisher imprint