Report: Former Spurs boss could be set to return to replace Thomas Frank | OneFootball

*]:pointer-events-auto scroll-mt-[calc(var(–header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]” dir=”auto” tabindex=”-1″ data-turn-id=”request-WEB:97e6091e-18e6-4ef5-89e7-7dfd50d660f7-5″ data-testid=”conversation-turn-2″ data-scroll-anchor=”false” data-turn=”assistant”>

Tottenham Turn to Igor Tudor Amid Turbulence and Uncertainty

Tottenham Hotspur’s decision to appoint Igor Tudor as interim head coach arrives wrapped in urgency, intrigue and a fair degree of risk. With the club hovering five points above the Premier League relegation zone in 16th place, decisive action was required. Yet the choice of Tudor, a coach whose managerial journey has been nomadic and combustible in equal measure, has prompted raised eyebrows across the European game.

Credit must go to The Telegraph for bringing the deeper context of this appointment into sharp focus. Their reporting paints a portrait of a manager capable of igniting short bursts of performance, but rarely sustaining momentum over time. Spurs, it seems, are gambling on impact rather than endurance.

Tudor steps into north London with Tottenham’s season teetering between salvageable and catastrophic. His brief is clear, survival domestically, competitiveness in Europe, stability in the dressing room. Whether he can provide all three remains the defining question.

Photo IMAGO

Short-Term Fix or Strategic Risk

Tottenham’s hierarchy have been deliberate in framing Tudor’s arrival as temporary. The club are keeping the door open for Mauricio Pochettino to make a sensational return in the summer, a possibility that continues to stir emotion among supporters. For now though, pragmatism has trumped sentiment.

The Croatian arrives without Premier League experience, either as player or head coach. That absence of English football immersion heightens the gamble. His recent tenure tells its own story. He has not lasted more than a year in each of his last three jobs at Marseille, Lazio and Juventus.

Described by a former colleague as “too loud and emotional”, Tudor is said to be prone to tantrums and one source said: “Look at the amount of games at each club. That tells you everything.”

Another voice from his time in France offered a damning tactical summary: “He’s purely a transitional coach. His Marseille team was like watching basketball. Spurs have rolled the dice.”

Such assessments underline Tottenham’s intent. They are not seeking architectural vision, they are chasing immediate traction. Survival first, reflection later.

European Pedigree and Rapid Impact Credentials

If Tudor’s volatility raises concern, his capacity for instant improvement provides encouragement. His managerial career has averaged just 261 days and 30 matches per club, yet within those short cycles he has frequently sparked results.

He won three of his first five matches at both Juventus and Lazio in recent seasons, and also won five of his first six games at Marseille. These are not statistical footnotes, they are precisely the metrics Spurs are betting on.

His Lazio spell is particularly instructive. Taking charge after Maurizio Sarri’s resignation with the club in ninth, Tudor stabilised performances quickly, steering them to seventh and Europa League qualification. It was efficient, decisive work, even if it ended abruptly.

Tottenham’s leadership, led by Vinai Venkatesham and Johan Lange, have targeted that very trait. They wanted a coach capable of producing lift rather than long-term structural change.

Fabio Paratici’s previous working relationship with Tudor at Juventus inevitably fuels speculation, yet Spurs insist the decision was driven internally following Thomas Frank’s dismissal.

This is crisis management, not dynasty building.

Dressing Room Volatility and Leadership Questions

The Tottenham dressing room Tudor inherits is far from harmonious. Reports of player and fan friction, alongside a disgruntled captain publicly critical of the board, create a combustible environment.

It is a scenario Tudor has navigated before.

At Marseille, he walked into an emotionally charged institution and was booed in his first competitive match. Supporters resented him replacing Jorge Sampaoli. Tudor steadied results regardless, eventually leaving by choice after one season despite the club wanting continuity.

Yet harmony has not always followed him.

In Italy, he reportedly clashed with Juventus general manager Damien Comolli shortly before his dismissal. He was also said to have accused players of having “no dignity”. Public complaints about refereeing decisions did little to strengthen internal relationships.

Altercations were reported at Marseille too, including tension with Mattéo Guendouzi.

Temperament has long trailed Tudor, even as a player. His confrontation with Francesco Totti remains infamous, including Totti’s four-finger gesture during a 4-0 Roma victory after an elbow incident.

Such history raises an unavoidable question, can Tudor channel intensity constructively inside an already fragile Spurs environment?

Tactical Identity and Style Transformation

From a footballing perspective, Tudor brings clarity of ideology.

He favours a three-man defence, aggressive pressing structures and vertical transitions. His teams play with physicality and intensity, seeking to overwhelm rather than outmanoeuvre.

In 2022 he said he demands “courageous” football.

For supporters disillusioned by Thomas Frank’s pragmatism, those words carry appeal. Spurs fans have long craved front-foot identity, emotional connection and attacking bravery.

Yet implementing systemic change mid-season is complex. Coaching time is limited, player confidence is brittle and fixtures are unforgiving.

Tudor’s first match could hardly be more daunting, Arsenal, league leaders, in the North London derby. It is trial by fire, tactically and emotionally.

European competition adds another layer. Spurs are yet to learn their Champions League last-16 opponents, meaning Tudor must balance survival urgency with continental ambition.

His experience in that competition provides reassurance, but bandwidth will be stretched.

Pochettino Shadow and Summer Horizon

Hovering above Tudor’s interim tenure is the enduring figure of Mauricio Pochettino.

Chants of his name during defeat to Newcastle United underlined the emotional bond that remains. His Instagram post from London, dining with coach Toni Jiménez, only intensified speculation. Sources claim “he would walk back”.

Reality complicates romance. Pochettino is committed to the United States national team until after the World Cup, rendering any immediate return impossible.

Tottenham’s strategy reflects that timeline. By installing an interim now, they preserve flexibility for a broader summer search.

Roberto De Zerbi and Robbie Keane were considered but uninterested in temporary roles. Marco Rose and Edin Terzic were also discussed before Tudor emerged as the preferred short-term solution.

It is calculated patience from the board, stabilise now, decide later.

Stakes, Survival and Immediate Judgement

Tudor’s assignment is brutally simple.

Keep Tottenham in the Premier League. Compete credibly in Europe. Restore emotional alignment between players and supporters.

Failure in any one of those areas would cast his appointment as miscalculation. Success could position him for permanent consideration, even if the club insist summer options will be wider.

He is stepping into his 12th managerial role in 13 years. That churn speaks to volatility, but also to demand. Clubs repeatedly turn to him when urgency outweighs long-term planning.

As one observer noted, if Tudor is in north London for a good time rather than a long time, then so be it. That, it seems, is what he is used to.

Tottenham’s season now hinges on whether short-term intensity can deliver long-term safety.

Our View – EPL Index Analysis

Mood among Spurs supporters would sit somewhere between concerned and sceptical following this report.

There is recognition that action was necessary, the table does not lie, and drift under Thomas Frank had become unsustainable. Yet Tudor feels like volatility imported at the very moment stability is required.

Fans will appreciate his promise of aggressive football. Words like “courageous” resonate deeply after months of sterile performances. But survival battles demand control as much as passion.

Supporters will also note the pattern, short stays, dressing room clashes, emotional flashpoints. In a squad already strained, temperament matters as much as tactics.

The looming presence of Pochettino complicates Tudor’s authority too. If players believe change is coming regardless, interim messaging can lose force.

Still, there is reluctant hope.

If Tudor delivers immediate points, injects intensity and reconnects the team with the crowd, he may yet flip scepticism into belief. For now though, this feels like Spurs rolling the dice while glancing nervously at the table beneath them.