Ten Hag’s Three Years vs. Slot’s Three Games: Under Pressure Statistical Analysis | OneFootball

Ten Hag’s Three Years vs. Slot’s Three Games: A Comparative Analysis

The football world thrives on comparisons, and nowhere is this more evident than in the Premier League, where every match is dissected down to the smallest detail. A recent focal point of discussion has been the contrasting trajectories of Manchester United’s Erik ten Hag and Liverpool’s Arne Slot. Despite being at different stages of their careers in England, their approaches offer a compelling study in football management. This blog delves into the key talking points from the latest Under Pressure podcast by Anfield Index, where Dan Kennett, Simon Brundish and Hamzah Khalique-Loonat provided an insightful analysis of Ten Hag’s three years at Manchester United versus Slot’s impact in just three games at Liverpool.

Photo: IMAGO

Tactical Evolution vs. Immediate Impact

Erik ten Hag arrived at Manchester United with the promise of revolutionizing the club’s fortunes. Three years into his tenure, the results have been mixed. Manchester United has shown glimpses of the Ajax-inspired football that Ten Hag was known for, but consistency has been elusive. As Hamzah Khalique-Loonat noted, “Ten Hag likes to play a very transitional game… but it also means that if you’re going to play a very transitional game, the ball’s going to come back at you a lot of the time.”

In stark contrast, Arne Slot has made an immediate impact at Liverpool. In just three games, Slot has implemented a tactical structure that has revitalized a team that seemed to be losing its way. Dan Kennett highlighted this by saying, “Slot has changed Diaz’s role and Mo’s role in the three games… the fascinating thing of the three games is how Slot has changed.” Slot’s tactical adaptability has seen Liverpool become more unpredictable and harder to play against, with the team seamlessly switching between different strategies depending on the opponent.

Statistical Comparison: Performance Metrics

When analyzing the effectiveness of both managers, the statistics offer a telling comparison. Under Ten Hag, Manchester United’s performance metrics have been inconsistent. Despite periods of dominance, the team has often struggled to convert possession into meaningful chances. As Simon Brundish observed, “Manchester United’s structure is really strange… their 3-1-6 formation often leaves them exposed at the back.”

On the other hand, Liverpool’s performance under Slot has been nothing short of remarkable. In just three games, Liverpool has demonstrated a level of efficiency that has eluded Manchester United under Ten Hag. Simon Brundish pointed out, “We nailed them down for the second half of the first period of the game… we squeezed them, squeezed them, squeezed them, we just strangled the life out of them.” The contrast in execution is stark, with Liverpool showing a much higher conversion rate of chances created, as evidenced by their 3-0 win over Manchester United.

Key Player Utilisation: Two Approaches

Another key difference between Ten Hag and Slot lies in their use of key players. Ten Hag has often struggled to get the best out of his star players, with inconsistent performances from the likes of Marcus Rashford and Bruno Fernandes. Hamzah Khalique-Loonat noted, “Their decision-making was so poor throughout… they had transitions that they could have handled better.”

Slot, on the other hand, has quickly figured out how to maximise the potential of his players. The Under Pressure podcast highlighted how Slot has effectively altered the roles of Mohamed Salah and Luis Diaz to suit different match situations. As Dan Kennett remarked, “Slot’s preparation, video analysis, and pre-match game plans… it seems to be horses for courses.” This ability to adapt and prepare meticulously for each opponent has been a hallmark of Slot’s early success at Liverpool.

Photo: IMAGO

The Future Outlook: Longevity vs. Immediate Success

Looking ahead, the question remains whether Ten Hag can bring the same level of consistency to Manchester United that Slot has brought to Liverpool in such a short period. Ten Hag’s approach is one of long-term evolution, aiming to build a team that can compete at the highest level consistently. However, as the Under Pressure podcast pointed out, there are significant challenges to this approach, particularly in a league as competitive as the Premier League.

Slot’s success, while impressive, is still in its infancy. The true test will come as the season progresses and as Liverpool faces stiffer competition. As Simon Brundish concluded, “It’s going to be really interesting when we see when we don’t have any practice time… the next two blocks where we have a game every 3.14 days.” How Slot manages the team through this congested fixture schedule will provide further insight into his capabilities as a manager.

Photo: IMAGO

Tale of Two Managers

The comparison between Erik ten Hag and Arne Slot offers a fascinating glimpse into the world of football management. While Ten Hag’s journey has been one of gradual evolution, Slot has burst onto the scene with immediate success. The coming months will reveal whether Slot’s initial impact is sustainable and whether Ten Hag can finally bring consistency to Manchester United. As it stands, Slot’s early success at Liverpool suggests that he may be the manager to watch this season, while Ten Hag continues to search for the formula that will unlock Manchester United’s full potential.

This ongoing comparison will undoubtedly be a key talking point throughout the season, as both managers strive to prove their worth in one of the most demanding leagues in the world.