This is the Arsenal plan that can blunt PSG and land Champions League glory | OneFootball

As light and free as it feels around the Arsenal squad in Budapest, they are going to have to be mindful of a key requirement.

It will be one of those that the players have to have imprinted on their minds by the time they finally step onto that Puskas Arena grass, and the greatest stage in club football. When Arsenal are attacking, they need to ensure any move is taken to its conclusion; “to complete the action”; to not allow any loose balls.

The play has to go dead, or that’s how Paris Saint-Germain “kill” you.

It is the quality that has now been terrorising Europe for almost two years. No team in the modern game – or arguably in history – has been as good at rampaging from one end of a pitch to the other.

Such details could be perceived as another pointer to the many contrasts that invigorate this 71st Champions League final.

Above all, there’s the classic clash of styles that has been taken to another level since the semi-finals.

While PSG are a team constantly looking to expand the pitch with exhilarating attacking play, a calculated Arsenal bring everything into the margins.

One theme of the season has been whether some of this is influenced by the relative economic contrast between Arteta’s side and some of their rivals. For the second time this season, Arsenal have to overcome a state-owned club to claim a major trophy. Many reservations exist about Arsenal’s own capitalist ownership, of course, but the difference is one of scale.

Qatar might own Europe again.

open image in gallery

Vitinha, Khvicha Kvaratskhelia and Achraf Hakimi of Paris Saint-Germain look on during the training session (Getty)

And that difference has so far manifested in another grand contrast to this final.

While PSG are seeking to crown their new dominance with the historically resonant feat of becoming just the second club to win successive modern Champions Leagues – and only the eighth since the European Cup’s 1955 conception – Arsenal are just hoping for their first.

The north London side are now undeniably the biggest club yet to win the competition, in what is a surprisingly poor European record.

Arteta is said by those close to him to feel it is his “destiny” to be the first manager to bring the grand trophy to the club.

One slight curiosity to that quest is how Arsenal have already fulfilled a sense of fate this season. They’ve finally won the domestic title again.

If it would obviously be absurd to describe the ultimate fixture in club football as a “free hit” – especially given the yearning among Arsenal fans to win it – this is probably the freest hit a Champions League final can be. Fulfilling the great ambition of winning the Premier League means Arsenal will have enjoyed a great season, no matter what. And while that journey was driven – or almost undermined – by this notorious angst, it means the squad are in the rare position of almost just getting to enjoy this most pressurised of fixtures.

The game itself will dictate whether that’s a good thing or not.

open image in gallery

Mikel Arteta must combat Luis Enrique’s PSG machine with unpredictability (Getty)

Arsenal could still have their “head in the clouds”. And sometimes, but especially when you’re looking to start a new era, you have to seize such opportunities when they come.

There’s not just a first Champions League at stake, after all, but a double, and what would just be England’s sixth.

That long-awaited title has nevertheless affirmed something else that’s rare about this final. It is fittingly one between the two best teams in Europe, and arguably the first like that since 2009.

PSG have duly been talked up in a similar way to the Barcelona that won 17 years ago. Surpassing them by actually retaining the Champions League would afford quite the legacy, even if it is one used geopolitically.

On that, Budapest and this stadium are great venues for such a game, but not necessarily the right venues. The city has only 26,000 hotel rooms and the stadium only 67,155 seats, well over 20,000 less than Uefa’s favourite: Wembley. Budapest was already busy with tens of thousands of Arsenal fans by Thursday evening and absolutely heaving by Friday. You can feel the scale of the event.

It was an event that Viktor Orban long desired hosting, in a political context that is of course linked to why such an undersized venue is staging the final in the first place. There’s quite an irony that a prime minister frequently accused of democratic backsliding is not here for it, having been voted out just weeks beforehand.

open image in gallery

PSG coach Luis Enrique during training (Reuters)

It also looks likely to be a match that you would love to preside over. In the same way there arguably hasn’t been a showpiece between Europe’s two best sides since 2009, there hasn’t really been a great Champions League final since 2005.

This at least has all the ingredients, right up to the clash of styles.

And for all that the separate journeys have fostered a view that PSG are clear favourites, the view within football – and also within Arsenal – is that this is genuinely a 50-50 game.

PSG may have the best attacking trident in football, on top the most spectacular system, but Arsenal have the best defensive structure.

And if Luis Enrique is currently hailed as the best manager in the world right now, Arteta is possibly the best possible manager to take him on. He will pose the PSG coach challenges he hasn’t yet faced.

Even when the two teams met in last season’s semi-final, it was without many senior players, let alone this season’s signings. Arsenal still feel they should have won that tie.

Even within that frustration – with some of Arteta’s players known to want “revenge” – they were struck by a quality that has otherwise seen the rest of Europe unravel. You really can’t let concentration slip for a millisecond against PSG, not with those attackers.

open image in gallery

Vitinha's slippery style could evade Arsenal's press (Reuters)

Aside from being able to move the ball up the pitch so quickly, Luis Enrique’s side are also so fast in tight areas. The coach’s great tactical legacy is perhaps that he has revitalised the will to take people on. He has even given Pep Guardiola’s model something new.

It’s just that adapting to this – in the same way he himself has adapted Guardiola’s approach – is also what Arteta is especially adept at. Arsenal don’t just create defensive blocks, but multi-layered structures that are meticulously calibrated to individual movements.

One of Jurrien Timber’s many qualities is that he is able to internalise such game models immediately. And he’s also probably the best right-back in the world, too.

It’s why Timber's selection might well be the element on which the entire final turns, particularly with Kvicha Kvaratskhelia on that side of the pitch. This could be one of those decisions up there with Harry Kane being picked in 2019, for bad, or Dietmar Hamann being brought on in 2005, for good. Can Arteta really use a player who hasn't appeared in 70 days, no matter how much of an athlete he is?

Arsenal do have a clear need there.

Aside from not otherwise having a natural right-back due to Ben White’s injury, that is exactly the area where Kvaratskhelia has become possibly the best attacker in the world.

He is just joyous to watch, and devastating with it.

Although not always for a full game.

open image in gallery

The Puskas Arena and Budapest have brought issues for a game of this magnitude (PA)

There lies another contrast. While PSG constantly look to blaze from the moment of kick-off, that sensational Bayern Munich first leg reminded that they rarely end games so well. They have strength in depth in a weak league, sure, but their performances in these games involve a burning intensity that can also burn them out.

Against that, Arsenal have maybe the deepest squad in football, and an almost full complement. That means Arteta can drastically change things later in the match, but also gives him an advantage he has idealised since arriving at the club.

Arsenal can go into a game of this magnitude with a manager as good as Luis Enrique having no certainty about how they will line up. Arsenal may not know which way a newly fit Ousmane Dembele will turn, but PSG don’t know who will play.

The importance of that is illustrated in how the defending champions immediately kicked for a throw in that first leg against Bayern Munich, because they knew exactly the strengths and weaknesses of the defenders. In an era where analysis has become the key to the game, Luis Enrique can’t pick the opposition team.

That strength in depth is also complemented by an actual physical strength. Arsenal are bigger. PSG are also vulnerable at set-plays, and can struggle with second balls. An emboldened Declan Rice might be crucial there. It’s also why there’s been an expectation that Myles Lewis-Skelly’s energy will be picked over Martin Zubimendi.

Numerical superiority in crucial moments is going to be key. Opposition sides have noted that, if you just manage to break the PSG press and get past one of them, the whole game opens up. That is just easier than it sounds.

open image in gallery

Jurrien Timber has not played in more than two months (Reuters)

And if you have physicality, Vitinha can just evade you. Then PSG just know how to stretch you.

That is why Arsenal need to “complete their actions”. They need to ensure any move ends with a shot or a save, because otherwise PSG will just bring it right up the pitch.

It could almost be a final rallying cry for the season. Complete your actions, and so complete the double.

It certainly looks a complete final, unlike many even this competition has seen.