“We can’t win with Arne Slot” fans fume at Liverpool’s pathetic point | OneFootball

Arne Slot’s Breaking Point: What Gags Tandon and Dave Davis Reveal About Liverpool’s Collapse

Few periods in recent Liverpool history have carried the same sense of creeping inevitability as the current one. Across multiple Anfield Index shows, voices like Gags Tandon and Dave Davis have articulated a growing discomfort that stretches beyond sporadic bad form. Their reflections offer a window into a deeper structural unravelling — one that raises legitimate questions about whether Arne Slot can still command this Liverpool side.

The comments from both analysts expose patterns that cannot simply be dismissed as emotional reactions to a poor result. They point instead toward the repetition of systemic issues: fragility under pressure, tactical incoherence, and the unsettling possibility that players are no longer fully invested. When observed collectively, their remarks help chart the trajectory of a season slipping away.

Escalating Fragility and the Disappearance of Control

Gags Tandon’s assessment that there are “no redeeming features in this team” frames the defensive collapse at Leeds as something more than a one-off. His insistence that Liverpool “cannot be conceding three goals to this Leeds side” reflects a broader truth: a team with top-four ambitions should not be repeatedly breached by relegation-level opposition.

The recurring fragility is the thread running through all of it. At 2–0, as Gags notes, the game should have been managed with calm efficiency. Instead, Liverpool folded with alarming ease. His frustration at scoring three away from home and still failing to claim maximum points underlines the erosion of a quality that once defined Liverpool — control.

Even more concerning is Tandon’s admission that he “doesn’t recognise some of the players”, suggesting that effort levels have dropped below professional standards. The reduced running metrics, referenced by him as evidence of down-tooling, reinforce the suspicion that effort — the very minimum required — is no longer consistent.

Failures of Structure and a System Undermined

Dave Davis widens the critique by highlighting the inevitability of Liverpool’s late concession. His summary — that the ending felt “pathetic” and predictable from the moment a set piece was given away — speaks to a team stripped of resilience. Weakness, for him, is not an occasional lapse but a weekly identity.

His continued exasperation over set-piece incompetence illustrates an avoidable flaw that has grown into something symbolic. His view that the set-piece coach should be dismissed is not a call for scapegoating but an acknowledgement that failures have become entrenched.

Nowhere is this more stark than in the attack. Tandon’s blunt assessment that Cody Gakpo has “destroyed our attack this season” is echoed by Davis, who describes watching the forward as “evaporating the soul” from his body. Their shared frustration lies in decision-making: predictable, slow, and repeatedly harmful. A frontline built on instinct and movement cannot function when one part consistently disrupts flow.

When Faith in Arne Slot Breaks Down

Both analysts reach the same uncomfortable conclusion. Gags states plainly that Liverpool “are not going to win with Arne Slot”, and adds that while he admired last season’s achievement, the current scenario is “untenable”. Davis mirrors this, warning that the longer the club delays action, the more the manager’s legacy deteriorates.

The suggestion of an interim solution is not reactionary but logical. When tactical ideas fail, when relationships fracture, and when performances decline irrespective of opponent, the equation becomes simple: persistence becomes more damaging than change.

Reckoning with Reality

Through the combined lenses of Gags Tandon and Dave Davis, the picture forms clearly. Liverpool have reached a point where the problems cannot be attributed to bad luck, refereeing decisions, or short-term dips. This is structural. It is psychological. And above all, it is managerial.

Without decisive intervention, the season risks drifting into irrelevance. As both commentators argue in different ways, sentiment cannot outweigh the evidence. The team’s fragility, tactical disarray, and recurring collapses make one conclusion unavoidable: unless action is taken, Liverpool’s decline under Arne Slot may accelerate.