Why Tonda Eckert could face ban until 2027 over Southampton spying scandal | OneFootball

Why Tonda Eckert could face ban until 2027 over Southampton spying scandal | OneFootball

In partnership with

Yahoo sports
Icon: Football League World

Football League World

·15 May 2026

Why Tonda Eckert could face ban until 2027 over Southampton spying scandal

Article image:Why Tonda Eckert could face ban until 2027 over Southampton spying scandal

Tonda Eckert is facing a severe punishment if evidence emerges of his involvement in Southampton's spying case

Southampton are embroiled in a major spying controversy as they eye promotion to the Premier League.


OneFootball Videos


The Saints have been charged by the EFL for allegedly filming Middlesbrough’s pre-match training session ahead of their play-off semi-final first leg clash on Teesside.

The Hampshire outfit will now face an independent tribunal, where they are being threatened with the possibility of expulsion from the play-offs.

That would be a major blow for Tonda Eckert and the club, and it would consign them to another year of the second division despite making their way to the final.

A Shea Charles effort in extra time of the second leg earned Southampton victory over Boro, who could still be reinstated to face Hull City.

The EFL are hoping for a swift outcome of the investigation into the charge, regardless of outcome, in order to avoid too much disruption to the final, which is meant to take place on 23 May.

Tonda Eckert faces majorpotential punishment in Southampton spying case

Article image:Why Tonda Eckert could face ban until 2027 over Southampton spying scandal

It has been reported by The Sun that Eckert faces up to a one-year ban from football if it’s discovered that he ordered the alleged spying of Middlesbrough’s training session.

Technical director Johannes Spor is also under the same threat if any clear evidence comes forward of involvement in the incident.

An individual was seen filming the Teesside outfit’s training in the lead-up to their opening leg of their semi-finals last week, which is prohibited under the EFL’s rules.

The league introduced this policy when Leeds United were caught spying on Derby County in the lead-up to their league clash in February 2019, with the Whites receiving a £200,000 fine as a consequence.

The Canadian women’s side were also involved in a spying scandal during the 2024 Olympics, which led to then-manager Bev Priestman being banned from football for a year for her role played in the controversy.

This sets a clear precedent, which will now have Eckert concerned about the potential consequences if he is implicated in the controversy.

Middlesbrough have made it clear that they feel quite aggrieved by the entire situation, with Kim Hellberg visibly upset in the post-match press conference of their second leg defeat at St. Mary’s, while Southampton's actions have been condemned by the wider footballing world.

Riley McGree had given the visitors the lead, but goals from Ross Stewart and Charles overturned the score in Southampton’s favour.

But Boro could yet be reinstated to the play-off final if Southampton are expelled from the promotion shootout.

Hull City await in the final after the Tigers won 2-0 against Millwall in their semi-final.

Tonda Eckert will be in hot water if there is proof of his involvement in Southampton spying

Eckert walked out of his press conference following Southampton’s win against Middlesbrough after he was asked if he is a cheat.

It’s clear that he is unhappy with the situation, but if he is found guilty of ordering the spying then he will face a heavy sanction.

Being banned from football for a year would be a terrible punishment for his career, and he may not be able to recover from it.

Article image:Why Tonda Eckert could face ban until 2027 over Southampton spying scandal

So there is a lot on the line for him personally, as well as for the club, when this hearing gets underway.

Although, it must be stressed, no evidence has yet come forward publicly of any involvement by Eckert or Spor in this spying case, with the authorities frantically trying to find out exactly who was at the heart of such orders.

View publisher imprint