Judges refuse to alter Fernando Madureira’s conviction | OneFootball

The Porto Court of Appeal rejected requests for corrections to the ruling that sentenced Fernando Madureira to three years and four months in the 'Pretoriano' operation. The defense of 'Macaco' claimed nullities, highlighting the maintenance of an aggravating factor in the offenses against physical integrity in an attempt to reduce the sentence. Madureira argued that the assaults did not result from "a common action" among the defendants. The judges stated that they had already considered all the issues raised and deemed the decision duly justified.

José Pereira, another defendant, also filed a complaint. Among the points raised was the incorrect reference in the ruling that the defendant possessed a loaded weapon, a correction that the magistrates made in that part of the decision. Fernando Madureira and other defendants may still appeal to the Supreme Court, although its admissibility seems unlikely.

On February 6, the judges reduced the sentence imposed in the first instance by five months. On the same day, the former leader of the supporters' group was released for having reached the two-year limit in preventive detention, although there is a possibility he may have to return to prison to serve the remainder of the sentence. The court found that Madureira planned to silence supporters of Villas-Boas and that threats and assaults occurred. In total, nine defendants were convicted.

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇵🇹 here.