STJD grants Bruno Henrique, of Flamengo, a stay of suspension | OneFootball

The Superior Sports Court of Justice (STJD) decided to grant this Saturday a suspensive effect to the forward Bruno Henrique of Flamengo, suspended for 12 games after answering a process in the sports sphere for manipulating a yellow card to benefit family members in online betting.

Thus, Bruno Henrique returns to have playing conditions while waiting for the appeal of his trial. Even so, he did not continue with Flamengo's delegation to Caxias do Sul - due to pain - and will not be available to face Juventude.

Official note from Flamengo

The Rio team confirmed the information of the suspensive effect:

Clube de Regatas do Flamengo reports that the Superior Sports Court of Justice (STJD) granted the request for suspensive effect of the decision that had applied a 12-game suspension to the athlete Bruno Henrique.

The measure, awaited by Flamengo in view of the divergent votes presented at the 1st Disciplinary Commission — which accepted the preliminary prescription — ensures the full playing condition of the forward until the trial of the case by the Full Court.

Thus, Bruno Henrique is free to perform normally for the red-black team. Clube de Regatas do Flamengo reports that the Superior Sports Court of Justice (STJD) granted the request for suspensive effect of the decision that had applied a 12-game suspension to the athlete Bruno Henrique.

The measure, awaited by Flamengo in view of the divergent votes presented at the 1st Disciplinary Commission — which accepted the preliminary prescription — ensures the full playing condition of the forward until the trial of the case by the Full Court.

Thus, Bruno Henrique is free to perform normally for the red-black team.

Remember the case

The case dates back to November 2023, when Flamengo was defeated by Santos 2 to 1, in Brasília, in a match of the Brazilian Championship.

The red-black forward received a yellow card for a foul and then another for insulting the referee, which resulted in his expulsion.

The STJD's Prosecution Office framed the player in articles 243, §1º, Art. 243-A. Articles 184 and 191, paragraph III, as well as article 65 (paragraphs II, III and V) of the CBF's General Competitions Regulations were also cited.

Process in Common Justice

In addition to the sports process, the forward is also a target of Common Justice. The Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories (TJDFT) accepted a complaint from the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Federal District and Territories (MPDFT), making the player a defendant for participation in the alleged scheme.

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇧🇷 here.