The Transfer DealSheet: Latest on Man Utd, Arsenal, Liverpool, Real Madrid and more | OneFootball

The Transfer DealSheet: Latest on Man Utd, Arsenal, Liverpool, Real Madrid and more | OneFootball

In partnership with

Yahoo sports
Icon: OffsAIde

OffsAIde

·30 de junio de 2026

The Transfer DealSheet: Latest on Man Utd, Arsenal, Liverpool, Real Madrid and more

Imagen del artículo:The Transfer DealSheet: Latest on Man Utd, Arsenal, Liverpool, Real Madrid and more

A frantic window is unfolding, with moves across England and Europe. According to NY Times, Manchester United’s Manuel Ugarte has suffered knee ligament damage and Manchester City have reached a £116m agreement for Elliot Anderson.

United have an agreement to sign Atalanta’s Ederson, pending post-World Cup medicals. Focus also remains on West Ham’s Mateus Fernandes, while Marcus Rashford is on course to rejoin training next month with reintegration under consideration.


OneFootball Videos


There is no fixed 30 June PSR deadline, since rules track club accounting dates. SCR will replace PSR next season, and Hull City must address a shortfall of about £6m to avoid a breach.

Arsenal’s sub-£60m verbal offer for Bruno Guimaraes, made via intermediaries, was rejected by Newcastle, who say he is not for sale and that no direct bid has arrived. Piero Hincapie’s loan becomes permanent on 1 July.

Chelsea are close to signing 21-year-old defender Marco Palestra from Atalanta. Como’s bids for Trevoh Chalobah have been turned down, with a £35m package sought, and Sunderland have rejected £8m for Granit Xhaka.

Liverpool’s winger search has shifted after Yan Diomande chose PSG as his next destination if he leaves RB Leipzig. Curtis Jones and Federico Chiesa could depart after talks with Andoni Iraola, and Inter’s bids for Jones have been insufficient.

City have finalised Enzo Maresca’s appointment and are targeting a right-back, a winger and another midfielder. Ayyoub Bouaddi is under consideration, while Chelsea’s Malo Gusto is admired but a £75m valuation is viewed as too high.

Source: NY Times

Ver detalles de la publicación