Anfield Index
·23 janvier 2026
Dave Davis: “Results, performances, and fan perceptions mean questions can be asked”

In partnership with
Yahoo sportsAnfield Index
·23 janvier 2026

Liverpool’s managerial situation has quietly become one of the defining narratives of the season. While Arne Slot remains in post, debate continues to swirl around his long-term future and the persistent shadow of Xabi Alonso.
As explored on Anfield Index’s Transfer Show, the discussion is less about immediate change and more about institutional confidence — and whether Liverpool can afford uncertainty at the top.
Trev Downey was clear about how recent events shaped sentiment:
“Up until very recently there was increasing pressure on the man, and I think the ignorant question about Xabi Alonso actually shifted things back in his favour.”
Slot’s position has been influenced as much by narrative as by results. Media speculation and public questioning have amplified minor setbacks, creating a climate of volatility.
Yet Davis stressed that internally, the picture is calmer:
“All the UK journalists are saying Liverpool are fully behind Slot at the moment. There are no plans to do anything before the summer unless the season completely collapses.”
This dual reality — external doubt versus internal support — defines Slot’s tenure so far.
Despite official backing, concerns persist about style and sustainability. Downey expressed unease with recent performances:
“We are not Slot-out merchants, but this doesn’t look right and I’m very worried. I don’t see enough change on the pitch to feel secure.”
Liverpool’s cautious, risk-averse football has delivered results, but not reassurance. Draws and narrow wins have masked deeper structural questions.
Davis echoed the legitimacy of this debate:
“It’s fair to have this conversation. The results, the performances, and the fan sentiment mean there are question marks.”
Supporters are not demanding perfection, but coherence. Without it, uncertainty multiplies.
Alonso’s name continues to dominate speculation. Downey highlighted why:
“People are steering towards Alonso because he’s available, and because he doesn’t have a job right now.”
Availability creates momentum. Fans and media gravitate towards visible alternatives, especially those with emotional connections to the club.
Yet Davis injected realism:
“There is absolutely no guarantee Alonso ends up at Liverpool. Bayern, City, and others are in the picture.”
Liverpool are not operating in isolation. Elite coaches attract elite suitors. Waiting carries opportunity cost.
Crucially, Davis revealed that groundwork already exists:
“Liverpool are well-versed in Alonso’s plans… those conversations have already happened.”
This suggests contingency planning rather than panic.
The summer will likely determine Liverpool’s next cycle. Slot’s contract situation, Champions League status, and recruitment outcomes will shape the verdict on his leadership.
Downey framed the broader concern:
“If Liverpool are waiting until the summer, you can understand why fans worry about being gazumped again.”
History supports that fear. Hesitation has previously resulted in missed opportunities.
However, Liverpool’s modern identity has been built on restraint and structure. Abandoning that philosophy risks repeating the chaos seen elsewhere in the Premier League.
The Slot-Alonso debate is therefore less about personalities and more about governance. Can Liverpool balance emotional pressure with strategic clarity?
For now, Slot remains trusted. Alonso remains admired. The space between those realities will define the club’s immediate future.


Direct






































