Malaspina: Huracán and San Lorenzo escaped thanks to a football-mad president | OneFootball

Argentinian football has once again been engulfed in controversy after an explosive revelation: according to Cristian Malaspina, president of Argentinos Juniors, the Government personally intervened in 2017 to prevent San Lorenzo and Huracán from being relegated due to sanctions related to Financial Fair Play. The executive claimed that a call from Casa Rosada stopped the deduction of points that would have sent both clubs down to the B division, and that this maneuver led to the first annulment of relegations during that period.

During his appearance on La Fábrica del Podcast, the head of “El Bicho” detailed an episode that—according to him—marked a turning point in the structure of Argentinian football. He recalled that in 2017 and 2018, when the Superliga tried to enforce Financial Fair Play, both San Lorenzo and Huracán had been sanctioned for violations and were facing a points deduction that would have sent them directly to relegation. At that time, Marcelo Tinelli and Matías Lammens were leading “El Ciclón,” while “El Globo” was experiencing a similar financial situation.

According to the executive, the reaction came from the highest political level. “There was a football-loving president of the nation with a friend who was president of a very big club. He didn’t want the points deducted from two big clubs. If it had been enforced, Huracán and San Lorenzo would have been relegated,” he recounted. Although he did not mention names, it was clear he was referring to Mauricio Macri, then President of the Nation, and his relationship with Tinelli.

Malaspina asserted that the call from Casa Rosada was decisive. “They asked for the points not to be taken away. When it was raised in the Commission, imagine the executives from the other clubs fighting relegation… the first thing they said was to suspend relegations,” he explained. That decision, according to his account, blocked the plan to reduce the number of teams and kept the championship divided among 28 clubs.

The executive also emphasized that the decision was not the result of Claudio Tapia or the AFA leadership, but a direct consequence of that political intervention. “It wasn’t Tapia who stopped it. We were left with 26, then the pandemic came and we ended up with 28, and now the decision has been made to go back to 30 as in 2014,” he pointed out.

In his final analysis, Malaspina pointed to the root of the problem: the lack of clear rules and the tendency to change decisions on the fly. “We represent the clubs. No one will want to sign up for a tournament with 10 relegations because no one is exempt from falling. But we have to manage this reality,” concluded the president of Argentinos Juniors.

The revelation has reopened an old debate in Argentinian football: political influence, executive maneuvering, and decisions that end up altering the sporting course of the championships.

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇪🇸 here.