PSG – Why the Parc des Princes sale is reaching a crucial stage | OneFootball

PSG – Why the Parc des Princes sale is reaching a crucial stage | OneFootball

In partnership with

Yahoo sports
Icon: Parisfans.fr

Parisfans.fr

·25 juin 2026

PSG – Why the Parc des Princes sale is reaching a crucial stage

Image de l'article :PSG – Why the Parc des Princes sale is reaching a crucial stage

According to Le Parisien, the file regarding the sale of the Parc des Princes is reaching a new stage this Thursday, with a steering committee meeting being held at Paris City Hall. Paris Saint-Germain is keeping several options open, but the club’s historic stadium is clearly back in the discussion.

A first official step in a never-ending case

“It is the first official step toward a sale of the Parc des Princes. This Thursday, June 25, a steering committee on the expansion of the stadium at Porte de Saint-Cloud is being held at Paris City Hall.”

The symbolism is strong. After years of deadlock between PSG and the City of Paris, the Parc des Princes is no longer just a matter of public statements or political tension. The case is entering a more concrete working phase, with a meeting focused on the technical aspects of the project. For the Parisian club, the issue remains the same: securing a venue capable of supporting its development.


Vidéos OneFootball


An expansion project still at the heart of the matter

“Victoriano Melero, the club’s CEO, will explain the approach and the expectations of a club that has also launched extensive studies related to the construction of a new stadium in Poissy and Massy. He will also outline the expansion project for the Parc des Princes, increasing its capacity from 48,000 to 60,000 seats.”

PSG is not closing any doors. That is the whole point of this case: the Parc is back in the running, but Poissy and Massy are still being considered as credible alternatives. Paris wants to stay at the Parc, but not under just any conditions. Increasing capacity to 60,000 remains a key point, because the current stadium inevitably limits matchday and hospitality revenues for a club aiming for the very top level in Europe.

Al-Khelaïfi keeping his distance, but still the final decision-maker

“Nasser Al-Khelaïfi will not be present. […] The PSG president is not meant to take part in these working meetings. […] Al-Khelaïfi will step in only at the very end of the process, when the time comes to choose between the three files presented to him.”

Nasser Al-Khelaïfi’s absence does not mean a lack of interest—quite the opposite. The PSG president is letting his teams handle the technical phase before stepping in at the decisive moment. It is also a way of keeping some distance from a sensitive matter, where every public statement can weigh on the negotiations. The club is therefore moving forward methodically, without publicly locking itself into a single option.

The sale price, the real sticking point in the case

“Has the sale price already been discussed? Without any doubt, even if no one, either at the club or at City Hall, wants to confirm it. As expected, the valuation carried out by the state property department will serve as the basis for the price set by Emmanuel Grégoire.”

This is the heart of the matter. Until the price is set, nothing is really finalized. The City of Paris wants to protect its interests, while PSG wants to avoid overpaying for a stadium that will still require major investment. The project is not limited to buying the Parc: it also has to take into account the construction work, the redevelopment of the surrounding area, and the constraints linked to the ring road.

An agreement that seems logical, but is not yet secured

“PSG wants to stay at the Parc, the City wants PSG to stay at the Parc—they’d still be stupid not to reach an agreement.”

That sentence sums up almost everything. From a sporting, historical and political standpoint, keeping PSG at the Parc des Princes remains the most obvious option. But obvious does not mean simple. The case has dragged on for too long to believe in an automatic conclusion. The steering committee marks progress, not a signature. The real test now will be turning shared intent into a solid agreement.

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇫🇷 here.

À propos de Publisher