Chelsea will not sell their biggest stars despite record pre-tax loss of £350m | OneFootball

Chelsea will not be forced into selling their biggest stars this summer despite recording the highest pre-tax loss in English football history, according to the Daily Mail.

Figures published in UEFA’s European Club Finance and Investment Landscape report show the Blues posted a staggering €407 million (£350m) deficit for the 2024/25 season.

That figure is surpassed only by FC Barcelona’s €555m loss in 2020/21. The numbers have put Clearlake Capital and Todd Boehly-owned Chelsea under intense scrutiny once again.

However, insiders have stressed that the headline figure does not reflect the club’s underlying financial health.

They insist the loss stems largely from non-cash accounting adjustments linked to the takeover.

Sources maintain that Chelsea are now profitable on an operating basis and remain in line with UEFA regulations under their existing settlement agreement.

Crucially, there is no pressure to cash in on prized assets such as Cole Palmer, Enzo Fernandez, or Moises Caicedo to comply.

The Blues have also structured contracts with heavy performance incentives, particularly linked to Champions League qualification, to help soften the blow should European revenues fluctuate.

UEFA’s assessment period covered a campaign in which Chelsea competed in and won the Conference League and secured a top-four league finish to return to Europe’s elite competition.

Still, while the accountants may argue the books are under control, the broader picture is damning.

Chelsea’s scattergun recruitment, from Deivid Washington and David Datro Fofana to Mathis Amougou, Lesley Ugochukwu, Omari Kellyman and Joao Felix, has bloated the books.

Of the 12 players they bought ahead of the 2024/25 season, only eight remain on the club’s books, and four are currently on loan.

Lavish spending without coherent planning has inflated losses and left a bloated squad.

In any well-run system, such a reckless strategy would invite far harsher consequences than creative accounting explanations.