Refereeing report’s shameful verdict: Benfica were worst hit | OneFootball

The refereeing assessment report for the 2025/26 Betclic League concluded that there were 40 matches with decisions deemed unsatisfactory by the referees and/or VAR. Almost half of those matches involved Benfica, Sporting and Porto, but the conclusions point to one detail that has not gone unnoticed: Benfica are the club with the most grounds for complaint.

Among the most notable cases is the match against Alverca, in the 21st round. In the 69th minute, Chissumba brought down Leandro Barreiro. The infringement was not given by referee Bruno Costa, in a decision considered incorrect in the analysis carried out.

Also against Famalicão, in the 32nd round, Benfica were denied a penalty at a decisive moment. Rodrigo Pinheiro stopped an Andreas Schjelderup cross with his arm, but neither referee Gustavo Correia nor VAR Rui Oliveira called the infringement. Another controversial episode happened against Braga, when a Benfica goal was disallowed after an incident involving Richard Ríos and Vítor Carvalho.

Their rivals benefited from disputed decisions. Sporting beat Santa Clara 2-1 thanks to a goal scored in the 90+4th minute following a corner that was incorrectly awarded. Against Estrela da Amadora, the Lions were not given a penalty for Otávio’s foul on Luis Suárez, but they also saw a Famalicão goal disallowed after a foul considered doubtful on Maxi Araújo.

In Porto’s case, the Dragons benefited from a penalty wrongly awarded against Arouca after an incident between Yellu and Seko Fofana. In addition, Zaidu escaped a red card in a match against Moreirense and was again involved in a controversial incident against Famalicão, when he struck Gustavo Sá in the face inside the box without a penalty being awarded.

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇵🇹 here.