Anfield Index
·17 Mei 2026
Report: Journalist accuses Salah of throwing Slot under bus

In partnership with
Yahoo sportsAnfield Index
·17 Mei 2026

There was something deeply revealing about the timing and tone of Mohamed Salah’s latest intervention. Liverpool had just been dismantled 4-2 by Aston Villa, a result that left supporters stunned and intensified scrutiny on Arne Slot’s difficult first season in charge. Then came Salah’s statement, posted publicly and delivered with unmistakable force.
The Egyptian forward did not hide behind vague platitudes. Instead, he questioned Liverpool’s direction, criticised the current identity of the side and pointed towards the standards established during the Jürgen Klopp era. It was the kind of message that reverberates far beyond social media.
As Dominic King reported in the original source for The Telegraph, Salah’s words have “increased the pressure on Arne Slot after criticising Liverpool’s playing style and questioning the dressing-room’s mentality.”
That sentence alone captures the gravity of the situation now unfolding at Liverpool. This is not simply frustration after a defeat. This is one of the club’s greatest modern players openly challenging what Liverpool have become under Slot.
Salah wrote: “Us crumbling to yet another defeat this season was very painful and not what our fans deserve.”
Those are not accidental words. “Crumbling” is loaded language. It speaks of a team losing structure, belief and authority.

Photo: IMAGO
Slot arrived at Liverpool tasked with the impossible challenge of succeeding Klopp. Few managers inherit a fanbase so emotionally connected to a predecessor. Yet the concern now is not merely about results. It is about identity.
Dominic King noted that Liverpool have now lost 20 matches this season and described Aston Villa’s victory as one where “the scoreline flattered last year’s champions.”
For Liverpool supporters, that observation cuts deep. The club’s decline has not been subtle. There have been repeated collapses, defensive chaos and performances lacking the aggression and intensity that once defined them.
Salah’s criticism sharpened that debate. His reference to Liverpool becoming “the heavy metal attacking team that opponents fear” was a clear nod to Klopp’s philosophy.
He continued: “That is the football I know how to play and that is the identity that needs to be recovered and kept for good. It cannot be negotiable and everyone that joins this club should adapt to it.”
Those remarks place Slot in an uncomfortable position. Salah is effectively arguing that Liverpool’s traditional approach has been abandoned and that the current direction does not suit the club’s elite players.
The fact that Curtis Jones reportedly “liked” Salah’s Instagram post only fuelled speculation about unrest inside the dressing room.
Liverpool supporters have always accepted setbacks when they can see commitment and clarity of purpose. What they struggle to tolerate is uncertainty.
Salah’s statement struck a chord because it reflected fears already spreading through the fanbase. The pressing intensity has faded. Defensive vulnerability has become commonplace. The attack no longer carries the same fear factor.
Dominic King wrote that Salah’s relationship with Slot has deteriorated significantly over the course of the season. He referenced the earlier dispute following Liverpool’s 3-3 draw with Leeds, when Salah accused Slot of “throwing me under the bus” after being dropped.
That history matters because it suggests these tensions are not new. They have been simmering for months.
Slot attempted to defend himself earlier this month when responding to suggestions standards had slipped. According to King, the Liverpool head coach was “clearly affronted” by claims regarding the culture inside the club.
Yet Salah’s comments indicate that at least some senior figures inside the dressing room remain unconvinced.
The Egyptian’s influence cannot be overstated. He is not simply another player voicing frustration. He is one of Liverpool’s defining modern icons and a figure supporters instinctively trust.
Liverpool now head into the closing stages of the campaign with pressure mounting around Slot from every angle.
Results have deteriorated. Performances have regressed. Now public criticism from Salah has created another storm.
There is also the emotional context surrounding Salah’s impending departure after nine extraordinary years at the club. His words carry additional weight because supporters know he understands what elite Liverpool standards should look like.
When Salah says “winning some games here and there is not what Liverpool should be about”, he is articulating a philosophy deeply embedded within the club’s modern history.
For Slot, the challenge is now enormous. He must rebuild confidence, restore tactical coherence and prove he can reconnect Liverpool with the identity supporters demand.
Otherwise, Salah’s warning about Liverpool “crumbling” may become the defining description of this troubled era.
Langsung


Langsung





































