Thrylos 7 International
·12 August 2026
Tiknizyan and Casseres Jr Transfer Links Reignite After Olympiacos UCL Loss

In partnership with
Yahoo sportsThrylos 7 International
·12 August 2026


Olympiacos’ transfer market changed twice in the space of roughly 24 hours. First, Olympiacos themselves were eliminated from the Champions League. Then Red Star Belgrade were eliminated too. That second result matters because it alters the availability of Nair Tiknizyan.
Meanwhile, after a reported two-day pause, negotiations for Cristian Cásseres Jr have resumed with both Toulouse and the player. Those two developments tell us something important: Olympiacos have not abandoned their pre-NEC recruitment priorities. If anything, they are pushing them harder.
This is significant. A club that had lost confidence in the deal could easily have used Champions League elimination as the reason to disengage. Instead, talks have restarted.
That suggests Cásseres remains highly rated internally. The Venezuelan offers qualities Olympiacos clearly lacked against NEC:
mobility;
ball-winning;
transition coverage;
progressive carrying;
and enough technical quality to contribute in possession.
He is not simply a destroyer. That matters because Mendilibar publicly said Olympiacos need to improve both defensive structure and ball circulation.
Negotiations frequently stall. That does not mean they die. Toulouse have their valuation. Olympiacos have theirs.
The relevant point is that both parties are talking again. If other French clubs are genuinely interested, Olympiacos cannot assume the player will remain available indefinitely. But the player-side discussions matter.
If Cásseres is receptive to Piraeus, that gives Olympiacos leverage over purely club-level negotiations.
It does not determine the fee. It can influence the outcome.
This is the cleaner development. Red Star had a rational reason not to sell an important player while Champions League qualification remained alive.
That reason has now weakened substantially. Nikolakopoulos reports that their elimination could open the route for Olympiacos, who have already held discussions over the Armenian left-back.
The timing therefore has nothing to do with a new scouting discovery. Olympiacos already liked Tiknizyan.
What changed is the seller’s competitive context.
Olympiacos have spent considerable time on Anass Salah-Eddine, but that deal has repeatedly run into uncertainty over the player's preference.
Tiknizyan presents a different proposition. If Red Star are now genuinely willing to negotiate and the player is receptive, Olympiacos may finally have a route to stop waiting.
There is a broader recruitment principle here.
At some point, availability becomes part of player quality. The theoretically perfect target who does not want to come is not actually the best target.
He is aggressive. Vertical. Athletic. Comfortable playing high. And capable of contributing directly in the final third.
Those qualities fit an Olympiacos team whose full-backs are expected to do much more than defend. But the NEC matches also demonstrate the question Olympiacos must answer before signing any attacking full-back:
who protects the space behind him?
That is why the Cásseres and Tiknizyan files actually connect tactically. A more mobile, defensively active central midfielder can help protect a more adventurous full-back. Recruitment should be understood as a system, not isolated names.
A midfielder and a left-back were already priorities. Within minutes of management reports saying Marinakis wants aggressive reinforcement, fresh transfer reporting says:
Cásseres talks are back.
Tiknizyan’s route is opening.
That sequence is difficult to ignore.
It does not mean either deal is finished.
But this is the first indication that Olympiacos’ post-elimination response is moving from internal review to executable transfer business.
Live




Live


Live

































