
Anfield Index
·25 agosto 2025
Off-Field Friendships Add Edge to Liverpool and Newcastle’s Isak Transfer Battle

In partnership with
Yahoo sportsAnfield Index
·25 agosto 2025
Electric. That is how Eddie Howe described the atmosphere expected at St James’ Park for Newcastle United’s first home game of the season against Liverpool. Under the floodlights on a Bank Holiday Monday, emotions on Tyneside will run high, fuelled by weeks of frustration and a sense of betrayal.
Alexander Isak’s desire to leave for Liverpool has created shockwaves across the club. His refusal to play, turning his back on Howe and his team-mates, has left fans angry and executives scrambling for solutions. “Harness that, use it, but not be reckless with it,” Howe said, aware of the challenge ahead.
What makes this saga compelling is the web of personal history connecting Howe to Liverpool’s hierarchy. As The Athletic revealed, “Rather than the friction that exists in so many relationships between coaches and sporting directors — as was the case, to varying degrees, between Howe and Dan Ashworth and Paul Mitchell at Newcastle — the Howe-Hughes dynamic was defined by total trust and a shared vision.”
Photo: IMAGO
Richard Hughes, Liverpool’s sporting director, was Howe’s team-mate at Portsmouth and later his trusted colleague at Bournemouth. Alongside Michael Edwards and David Woodfine, Hughes forms part of Liverpool’s executive team, a group that shares a bond with Howe dating back two decades. That history adds a layer of complexity to an already tense situation.
Liverpool’s pursuit of Isak is business, not personal. Their £110m opening bid was rejected, with Newcastle insisting on £150m and a replacement before sanctioning any sale. The Merseyside club sees Newcastle’s stance as predictable, while Newcastle views Liverpool’s approach as unsettling and disrespectful.
This row has been compounded by Liverpool’s successful signing of Hugo Ekitike, a player Newcastle thought they were close to securing as a potential Isak replacement. Howe’s frustrations are clear, even if he downplays them publicly. “It’s not personal. It’s professional,” he insisted when asked if his relationships influenced the situation.
Behind the scenes, however, feelings of animosity and distrust linger. One insider suggested events have caused “a certain degree of animosity” and that Howe has felt “disrespected”.
The Athletic points out a stark contrast. Newcastle’s on-pitch progress has outpaced the club’s structural development since the PIF-led takeover. Chief executive Darren Eales is departing, and the sporting director position is in transition. Ross Wilson is expected to join from Nottingham Forest, but uncertainty remains.
Liverpool, by contrast, are streamlined, with Edwards and Hughes executing strategy decisively. Their ability to act quickly underlines why they have secured targets like Ekitike while Newcastle falters. Howe once shared a vision with Hughes, but today they stand on opposite sides of one of the summer’s most dramatic transfer battles.
As Howe put it: “The word ‘irretrievable’ is not really in my dictionary.” Whether that optimism proves justified will depend on the final days of the transfer window.
This situation reflects the new reality under Arne Slot. The club is aggressive, strategic and focused on maintaining its place at the top after winning the Premier League last season. Targeting Isak shows intent, particularly after the departures of Darwin Núñez and Luis Díaz and the heartbreaking loss of Diogo Jota.
Liverpool fans will admire the ambition but recognise the need for patience. Isak would be an ideal fit for Slot’s high-intensity style, yet Newcastle’s £150m stance is a clear barrier. Whether Liverpool revisits this before deadline day or waits until January, the key takeaway is that the club’s leadership team operates with precision and resolve.
As for Howe, the feeling on Merseyside is that personal relationships cannot dictate business. Liverpool’s priority is strengthening the squad, not sentimentality. If Newcastle feels unsettled, that reflects the pressures of competing in an elite environment where emotional ties mean little when success is at stake.
Live
Live