Football | OneFootball

Bruno Prata questions Sporting's decision to sign Fotis Ioannidis. The journalist gave his analysis of the last summer's transfer window, where he believes that the emblems of Portuguese football cannot be as extravagant as in other European countries.

"The unprecedented investment of Sporting, Benfica and Porto reveals the growing challenge of finding young talent at a low cost. The effectiveness of European scouting has increased, reducing Portuguese clubs' access to market opportunities. An example of this is the 20 million paid by Porto for Froholdt, and the 27 million spent by Benfica on Ríos and Sudakov.", he told Record newspaper, before moving on to an example from the lions.

"Although the context helps explain the high values, it does not justify certain risk bets. Benfica signed Lukebakio for 20 million (plus 4 in variables), despite the player being almost 28 years old and having limited appreciation margin. Sporting did the same with Luis Suárez, paying 22.16 million, plus 5.3 million and 10% of future capital gains", he added.

Next, Bruno Prata refers to one of Sporting's biggest investments in this market - who is set to make his debut against Famalicão - Fotis Ioannidis: "Ioannidis, signed by Sporting for 22 million plus 3 in objectives, and with 25% of the capital gains conceded, lost space at Panathinaikos, which raises doubts about the criteria. In these cases, the urge to sign seems to have surpassed the real sporting need, generating the perception of consumerism more than strategy"

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇵🇹 here.