“For me, that's a red”: Calado wants Zaidu off, ignores Prestianni | OneFootball

There are phrases that say it all. When José Calado states, without hesitation, “for me, that’s a red card,” regarding an incident with Zaidu, the debate ceases to be merely technical and starts to reveal the lens through which certain plays are interpreted in the media space.

The commentary itself begins by acknowledging the essential: “I think Porto always had the game under control” and “the victory was never really in question.” So, if FC Porto was superior, if they dominated the match and made the task “easy,” as he himself admits, why does the focus end up falling almost exclusively on a single incident? It’s a legitimate question, especially when Porto’s superiority was, according to that same analysis, evident.

Calado insists: “it’s above the ankle, not on the top of the foot,” and reinforces that “for me, it was poorly judged.” It’s an opinion, of course, and should be treated as such. But it’s also worth looking at the pattern with which these opinions arise. When the topic involves FC Porto, does the level of scrutiny always rise a notch? And when there are harsh tackles in other games, with players from other teams, does the tone remain just as categorical?

This is where recent memory matters. In the match between Benfica and FC Porto, there was a challenge by Prestianni on Martim Fernandes that many considered much more serious. And yet, where was this same public vehemence calling for a red card? Where was the same “for me, that’s a red card” repeated with such conviction? The question doesn’t accuse anyone; it merely exposes a difference in criteria that is plain to see.

Even in the midst of criticism of the incident, there is a recognition worth highlighting: “Zaidu has been, in my view, a player not very valued this season at Futebol Clube Porto” and “every time he plays, he says ‘I’m here, I’m an option.’” It’s a fair point. Zaidu has responded when called upon, showing commitment, depth, and competitive usefulness. He doesn’t always get the credit he deserves, but he keeps showing signs of commitment to the team.

In the end, what really mattered on the field remains: “the victory suited Futebol Clube Porto, because they were the better team.” And that, amid all the noise, is what stands out. FC Porto asserts itself by playing, competing, and winning. The rest? It will always be part of the noise that surrounds those who are unsettling because of their greatness.

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇵🇹 here.