Anfield Index
·31 de janeiro de 2026
Paul Joyce: Liverpool Won’t Allow Jones Departure

In partnership with
Yahoo sportsAnfield Index
·31 de janeiro de 2026

Liverpool stance firm as Curtis Jones interest surfaces
Liverpool’s January posture has been defined by restraint, and the reporting from Paul Joyce of The Times sharpens that picture. With days left in the window, the club have drawn a clear line. No senior exits. That resolve has been tested by interest from Inter Milan in Curtis Jones, yet the response from Anfield has been swift and unequivocal.
Joyce reports that Liverpool “will not sanction the departure of any senior players before the transfer window closes,” a sentence that carries weight beyond one midfielder. It speaks to squad protection, to a recognition that stability matters as much as opportunity when margins tighten.
Jones sits in an awkward but powerful space. He has 16 months left on his contract, enough time to avoid panic, not enough to invite complacency. Reports in Italy suggest Inter proposed a loan deal with a view to a €40 million transfer. Sources at Inter accept the idea was a long shot. Liverpool clearly agree.

There is a tendency to reduce players like Jones to numbers and minutes. Yet his value at Liverpool is cultural as well as tactical. He understands the tempo of the club, the emotional weather of matches, the responsibility that comes with wearing the shirt. Those things do not depreciate with a balance sheet.
The interest itself is telling. Inter do not make speculative approaches without a football case. Jones offers control, press resistance and positional intelligence. He also offers availability. Even when not starting, he provides a level of trust from the bench that managers covet.
Inter’s curiosity is not occurring in isolation. Their midfield planning has been nudged by Davide Frattesi considering a switch to Nottingham Forest, prompting the Italian club to consider reinforcements. That context matters. This was not a targeted extraction from Liverpool, more a scan of options in a tightening market.
Liverpool’s stance mirrors their response to Tottenham Hotspur regarding Andrew Robertson. As Joyce notes, Liverpool are not in a position to consider exits. The message is consistency.
Jones missed the Champions League win over Qarabag in midweek but is expected to be back in the squad for Newcastle’s visit. That detail grounds the story in immediacy. This is not about hypothetical futures. It is about the next game, the next decision, the next three points.
Liverpool are protecting optionality. In a season defined by fine margins, removing trusted depth would be an act of self harm.
From a supporter’s perspective, this feels like common sense finally winning out. Curtis Jones may not dominate headlines, but seasons are rarely won by highlight reels alone. They are won by reliability, by players who can step in without the whole system wobbling.
The reported €40 million valuation sounds flattering, yet it also underlines why a loan makes little sense. If Inter truly believe Jones is worth that figure, then Liverpool would be mad to weaken themselves first and negotiate later. Keeping him is not romantic loyalty, it is strategic patience.
Fans have watched too many January windows where short term logic trumped long term coherence. This decision suggests learning. Jones returning for Newcastle matters more than a theoretical fee. Depth has been Liverpool’s quiet advantage in recent months, and surrendering it would send the wrong signal to the dressing room.
There is also a wider message. Liverpool are not a shop window. They are competing. That mindset, more than any individual player, is what supporters want to see reinforced.








































