Parisfans.fr
·25 February 2026
Accuser’s lawyer picks apart Hakimi’s defence in rape case

In partnership with
Yahoo sportsParisfans.fr
·25 February 2026

Achraf Hakimi, a 27-year-old right-back for Paris Saint-Germain, has been under investigation for rape since the end of 2023 following a statement made by a 23-year-old woman (at the time of the events) to the judicial police. This Tuesday, it was announced that Hakimi is being sent to trial in this case, which has angered his lawyer. Me Rachel-Flore Pardo, the lawyer for the woman accusing the Moroccan international, reacted strongly on RMC Sport.
“I will not let Achraf Hakimi’s defense denigrate, slander, and insult my client. In the messages in the file, there are also these: ‘I beg you, hurry up, he raped me.’ That’s what my client says, those are her words. Achraf Hakimi’s defense insists that in this case, my client attempted extortion, that she is mercenary, that she wants money. There is not much to gain by taking legal action for rape to get money. We don’t have much to gain, it’s a reality, and this applies to all rape victims in France.” There is nothing in the file, not a shred of evidence that suggests any attempt at blackmail or extortion by my client. We need to be very clear. I am not the only one saying this. Those who are convinced include the public prosecutor and the investigating judge. So now, enough of these slanders, enough of these lies.
Enough of these false elements being spread everywhere. It’s not true. Contrary to what Achraf Hakimi’s defense says, my client fully cooperated in the investigation. Achraf Hakimi’s defense tells us that my client obstructed all investigative acts. It’s perfectly false. My client went to the police station the very same day. When she appeared before the investigators, she said she wasn’t ready yet and would think about it, but she wanted to present herself immediately because she believes that even a football player does not have the right to abuse her. And I feel it’s time people accept that.”
As always with such a case, we must be very careful while waiting for the court's decision. We do not have all the elements, which are also contradictory from one side to the other. It’s difficult to see clearly, as each side logically defends its position and version. It is not a question of declaring Hakimi guilty before the trial, nor of exonerating him. That is not our place, nor anyone else's outside the case.
It would even be preferable for public statements to cease. This does not advance the legal process and does not provide information since the two parties do not agree. The wisest course is to wait and let justice do its work.
This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇫🇷 here.









































