EPL Index
·27 November 2024
In partnership with
Yahoo sportsEPL Index
·27 November 2024
Chelsea’s revolving door of transfers continues to make headlines, and not always for the right reasons. While Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall finds himself under scrutiny and facing comparisons to the ill-fated Danny Drinkwater, Pedro Neto is drawing rave reviews as a potential “signing of the season.” The contrasting fortunes of these two players highlight the challenges Chelsea face in balancing a squad bursting with talent.
Photo: IMAGO
Signed for £30 million after playing a pivotal role in Leicester City’s Championship-winning season, Dewsbury-Hall arrived at Chelsea with high hopes. However, his limited game time—just 44 Premier League minutes—has raised questions about his future at Stamford Bridge. Former Chelsea midfielder Emmanuel Petit’s remarks, via Metro, were particularly damning:
“Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall looks like the new Danny Drinkwater at Chelsea. He spent so much time on the bench and ended up going out on loan, and that could well happen again with Dewsbury-Hall.” Photo: IMAGO
The comparison to Drinkwater, who struggled to justify his £35 million fee and faded into obscurity, is a cautionary tale for Dewsbury-Hall. Despite his potential, competition from established midfielders like Moises Caicedo, Romeo Lavia, and Enzo Fernandez has relegated him to the fringes.
In stark contrast, Pedro Neto is emerging as a standout performer for Chelsea this season. Neto has brought dynamism and creativity to Chelsea’s flanks, earning praise as potentially the “signing of the season.” His consistency and ability to impact games have been a breath of fresh air for a Chelsea side often criticised for lacking cutting edge in attack.
Photo: IMAGO
Chelsea’s approach to the transfer market, which often prioritises quantity over quality, has led to a bloated squad where talented players struggle for opportunities. Petit’s comments encapsulate the challenge for new signings:
“They have splashed so much money and bought so many young talented players that they have two or three teams in the dressing room. Be very careful when you join Chelsea.”
Dewsbury-Hall’s predicament underscores the risks of joining a club where competition is fierce, and squad rotation can hinder development.
The comparison to Danny Drinkwater, while harsh, feels like a stark warning of what could happen when a talented player fails to integrate into Chelsea’s midfield. With players like Caicedo and Fernandez firmly established, it’s difficult to see where Dewsbury-Hall fits in.
Loaning him out might seem like the logical solution, but it could also be the beginning of the end for his Chelsea career. How many players have gone out on loan only to never return? Fans were excited about Dewsbury-Hall’s signing because of his Championship exploits, but it now feels like another misstep in Chelsea’s scattergun transfer policy.
On the flip side, Pedro Neto’s performances have been a rare positive. His creativity and pace have given Chelsea a new dimension, and it’s thrilling to see a player settle so quickly. But it raises a question: why can’t the same support system that helped Neto flourish be applied to Dewsbury-Hall?
For many fans, the frustration lies in seeing a club with so much talent squander its resources. If Chelsea truly want to develop young players, the approach to recruitment and integration needs to change. Otherwise, more promising players will follow the same path as Drinkwater—full of promise but ultimately unfulfilled.
Live
Live