EPL Index
·21 September 2026
Manchester United looking at former Chelsea man as Carrick alternative

In partnership with
Yahoo sportsEPL Index
·21 September 2026

Manchester United’s uncertain start has brought a familiar question back into view: how much time does a manager earn by repairing the damage left by his predecessor?
For Michael Carrick, that question now comes with a prominent name attached. Antonio Conte is being linked with Old Trafford, although United may face competition from Juventus and AC Milan if they decide a change is necessary.
For now, this remains a story about possible successors. Interest in another manager does not, by itself, establish that a decision has been made.

Picture:IMAGO
Carrick’s position carries a particular complication. According to the supplied report from The Hard Tackle, he took over following Ruben Amorim’s departure during the 2025/26 season and guided Manchester United to third place. That recovery earned him the permanent job.
Such an appointment creates an expectation of continuity. The encouraging performances are supposed to become the foundation for something durable.
Instead, the same report describes a start to the new Premier League campaign containing just one victory from four matches, alongside an early EFL Cup exit against Brighton & Hove Albion.
Surrendering a two-goal lead to lose 3-2 invites scrutiny beyond the result itself. For Carrick, the task is to demonstrate that United can manage difficult periods within matches and retain control when opponents respond.
Four league fixtures offer a limited sample. They still matter, particularly when a cup defeat adds to the sense of an opportunity being wasted.
The original reporting from Calciomercato links Conte with Manchester United should Carrick be dismissed, while also identifying Juventus and Milan as possible destinations. It describes United as a club who have “sempre seguito con interesse”, meaning “always followed him with interest”.
That wording matters. It suggests longstanding admiration rather than confirmation of negotiations or an imminent appointment.
Calciomercato also reports that Conte prefers to begin a project before the season starts, giving him time to shape preparations and contribute to squad construction. An approach from a sufficiently attractive club could, it suggests, alter that preference.
For United, the implication is straightforward. Securing Conte would involve more than deciding they wanted him. They would also need to offer a project he considered worth accepting at that particular moment.
The Hard Tackle’s account places Conte on the market following his departure from Napoli after two seasons, including their 2024/25 Serie A title success.
His previous achievements at Juventus and Chelsea explain why his availability would attract attention. Clubs considering a managerial change naturally examine candidates with experience of delivering under pressure.
Yet three clubs appearing in the same report does not establish an active bidding contest. Their circumstances could develop differently, and each would first have to decide whether replacing its current coach was justified.
Manchester United should therefore assess any possible appointment on its suitability. Competition from elsewhere would be a poor reason to accelerate a decision that requires a clear footballing argument.
The central issue is whether United believe Carrick can build on the progress that secured his appointment.
If they do, that belief needs to be supported by coherent decisions and improving performances. If they do not, identifying a replacement should involve explaining what will change around the manager as well as in the dugout.
Conte’s name makes the speculation more compelling. His availability, as reported, creates an option. Neither resolves the underlying question.
Carrick’s immediate responsibility is to improve results. United’s responsibility is to judge those results against a consistent idea of where the club is going.