Record! Abel cites Flamengo, rues Palmeiras's Libertadores loss | OneFootball

Record! Abel cites Flamengo, rues Palmeiras's Libertadores loss | OneFootball

In partnership with

Yahoo sports
Icon: Coluna do Fla

Coluna do Fla

·3 August 2026

Record! Abel cites Flamengo, rues Palmeiras's Libertadores loss

Article image:Record! Abel cites Flamengo, rues Palmeiras's Libertadores loss

What did Abel Ferreira, Palmeiras’ coach, say about Flamengo’s official statement?


The clash between Flamengo and Palmeiras is still going full steam in Brazilian football. After the teams ‘traded barbs’ over refereeing through official statements, coach Abel Ferreira fired back at the Rubro-Negro and once again ‘complained’ about last season’s Libertadores final.

We all have very short memories. Last year’s Libertadores final is an asterisk that I will not erase while I’m here. I even confronted the referee and asked why he didn’t see what everyone saw. We live in a world of men. We know there are flaws and virtues. I myself have several. If we all want to be perfectly righteous, then let’s all go to the Vatican -, he began.


OneFootball Videos


We are all human; there will be mistakes and correct decisions. Don’t be fooled by narratives. Stick together so what happened last year doesn’t happen again. The images are clear. It has been said many times by all clubs: sometimes they are benefited and sometimes harmed. Sometimes we benefit, other times we are harmed. Now, this was a situation between A and B. Palmeiras and Vitória. It wasn’t A, B, and C -, Abel Ferreira concluded.

Why did Flamengo get involved in Palmeiras’ dispute?

On Saturday (01), Flamengo issued an official statement to respond to Palmeiras’ complaints about refereeing. According to data compiled by Fla, the São Paulo club has been the most favored by refereeing in recent years.

However, Flamengo only spoke out again after Palmeiras mentioned the Rubro-Negro in an official statement. On that occasion, the São Paulo side criticized the STJD after Maurício was charged with violent conduct. In the statement, Leila Pereira’s club mentioned an incident involving Erick Pulgar.

What was Flamengo’s official statement?

After the World Cup break, the debate over refereeing once again took center stage in Brazilian football. And that is no coincidence. In recent years, a perception has taken hold among fans, football professionals, and a significant part of public opinion that a certain club has been repeatedly favored by refereeing decisions. This perception does not stem only from sporting rivalry. It is also supported by numbers. A survey by Espião Estatístico, from ge, shows that since the implementation of the VAR ranking in 2020 through the 2026 Brazilian Championship, Palmeiras has accumulated the highest number of decisions changed in its favor (65), the lowest number of decisions against it among the country’s main clubs (47), and the biggest positive balance in Brazilian football (+18). It also leads in the total number of VAR interventions. The numbers from this edition of the Brasileirão point in the same direction. Palmeiras is the 5th team that needs to commit the most fouls to receive a yellow card (6.72 fouls per booking), while its opponents are among those who receive the most yellow and red cards when facing them. No single piece of data proves favoritism. But statistics accumulated over seven seasons help explain why this debate never ends and remains a topic for everyone involved in football. The behavior adopted on and off the pitch also deserves reflection. It has become frequent to watch players and coaching staffs surround referees, complain ostentatiously, and cast themselves as victims even after obvious fouls or even a simple throw-in. A studied and coordinated action. It is important to recognize the investments made by the CBF and the advances promoted by the Refereeing Commission, with training, the release of VAR audio, and the implementation of new technologies. However, they are not the ones who enforce the rules that may ultimately decide matches. In the match between Vitória and Palmeiras, for example, the decisions were made by Alex Gomes Stefano on the field and Marco Aurélio Augusto Fazekas Ferreira in VAR. These are the referees who interpret incidents, apply the rules, and make decisions capable of changing standings, influencing title races, qualification spots, and relegation battles. Therefore, they must also be held accountable when they make serious mistakes, when they are passive in the face of pressure even on throw-ins, and when they fail to curb systematic misconduct, as the rules require. The World Cup recently showed the way; referees and players who were there, many of them playing in Brazil, acted there according to the “fair play” rule, and they should do the same here. Brazilian football needs to go back to discussing the game more than the refereeing. This will only be possible when referees adopt clear criteria and stop rewarding teams that use pressure throughout the match as a strategy. The rules must be followed by everyone, including the referees. Football is passion and a big business. That is why it needs credibility from those tasked with enforcing the rules of the game.”

Which incident in the Libertadores final is behind Abel Ferreira’s ‘complaint’?

The incident Abel Ferreira complains about happened in the opening minutes of the first half. On that occasion, Erick Pulgar made a heavy challenge on Bruno Fuchs, a Palmeiras center-back, but the referee waved play on and only showed a yellow card to the Chilean Flamengo player.

So, with the ball rolling, Flamengo was superior to Palmeiras. However, the Rubro-Negro only found the net at 23 minutes of the second half, after Arrascaeta delivered a cross onto the head of Danilo, who headed it into the back of the São Paulo side’s net.

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇧🇷 here.

View publisher imprint