Rodolfo Reis: "Penalty as big as the Clérigos Tower" | OneFootball

Rodolfo Reis: "Penalty as big as the Clérigos Tower" | OneFootball

In partnership with

Yahoo sports
Icon: Portal dos Dragões

Portal dos Dragões

·23 February 2026

Rodolfo Reis: "Penalty as big as the Clérigos Tower"

Article image:Rodolfo Reis: "Penalty as big as the Clérigos Tower"

Rodolfo Reis analyzed, on CMTV, FC Porto's victory against Rio Ave (1-0), highlighting Porto's dominance throughout the match and lamenting the lack of efficiency that prevented a more comfortable result.

The former blue and white captain considered that FC Porto could have settled the game much earlier, pointing out several missed opportunities.


OneFootball Videos


“FC Porto could have resolved the game much quicker. They score the 1-0, have absolute dominance, and hit the post three times,” he mentioned.

Penalty not awarded

One of the moments emphasized by Rodolfo Reis was an incident in the area that, in his opinion, should have resulted in a penalty for the dragons.

“There was a penalty, as obvious as the Clérigos Tower, that the referee didn't call, and I don't know why. The VAR saw it too.”

The commentator was critical of the refereeing team's decision, reinforcing that, although he accepts millimetric decisions related to offside, he does not understand the lack of intervention in this case.

“I've seen offsides by one centimeter, by five, by eight... and I accept that because I believe there is truth in those cases.”

Just victory, but without closing the game

Rodolfo Reis also highlighted that great teams must know how to control the final moments of matches, avoiding unnecessary risks when the result is tight.

“A great team is often seen in the final moments and not allowing a counterattack for a 1-1 draw.”

Despite the criticism of the refereeing and the lack of efficiency, the former Portuguese international valued the three points won by FC Porto, at a stage where each victory takes on added weight in the fight for the season's objectives.

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇵🇹 here.

View publisher imprint