The crucial factor shaping Man United’s future following Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s cost cuts | OneFootball

Man United’s Finances Show Progress, But Patience Is Running Out

Manchester United may no longer be winning trophies, but they are still delivering headlines off the pitch — especially when it comes to numbers. Credit goes to Chris Weatherspoon of The Athletic for laying out the stark truth: United are earning more than ever, yet still losing money at an alarming rate.

Record Revenues, Record Problems

United posted a staggering £666.5million in revenue last season, a figure most clubs could only dream of. But beneath the top line lies frailty. Six consecutive years of losses, pre-tax deficits amounting to £397.4million, and total debt now pushing above £750million. Costs have been slashed ruthlessly under Sir Jim Ratcliffe, with up to 450 full-time staff exiting and the wage bill dropping to its lowest since 2019-20. “United halved their operating loss to £30.5million,” the report noted, marking clear financial progress, but the club remains unable to balance the books.

Photo IMAGO

Even with record matchday and commercial growth, they are falling behind rivals. Liverpool are expected to surpass £700million in turnover, and Arsenal could soon overtake them. Across six years, United’s revenue has grown by just 1.02 per cent annually. For a club built on global dominance, treading water is as dangerous as sinking.

Transfer Spending Keeps Them Alive — And Endangered

Perhaps the most revealing figure is this: United have spent £510.8million on players since Ratcliffe arrived. Net transfer spending stands at £365.3million. For all the talk of efficiency, the club are gambling heavily on squad investment to revive results. “Returning United to former footballing glories is key to fixing finances,” is the clear message from inside the hierarchy.

However, poor sales continue to drag them down. Only £174.2million profit on player exits over a decade, ranking 18th in England. Even the sale of Antony — signed for over £80m — resulted in an accounting loss. Manchester City and Chelsea have mastered player trading. United are still learning.

On-Pitch Results Will Decide Everything

The pattern is obvious. When United fail to qualify for the Champions League, the financial model starts creaking. Broadcasting income last year was their lowest since 2016, while Liverpool “earned more than that just from winning the Premier League.” Europa League runs help, but Europe’s secondary tournament cannot sustain a club of this size.

Ruben Amorim does not need to win the title, but he has to restore Champions League status quickly. If not, even Ratcliffe’s millions will not be enough. The cost-cutting has bought United time. It has not bought them success.

Our View – EPL Index Analysis

From a Manchester United supporter’s perspective, this report lays everything bare. Fans have long shouted about bloated backroom staff, wasted transfer fees and questionable contracts, and now the numbers finally prove just how wasteful the club had become. Yes, Ratcliffe deserves credit for ripping up inefficiencies. But cutting 450 staff and trimming wages is meaningless if the squad still limps to seventh place. Supporters would rather see Harry Maguire and Casemiro’s £1million-a-week combined wages disappear than long-serving cafeteria workers or academy staff losing their jobs.

There is also a growing impatience with the idea that transfers alone will solve everything. Spending £500million to stand still feels like peak Glazer-era thinking. United fans want strategy, not scattergun deals. They want to become Liverpool or City in recruitment, not Chelsea in chaos.

Ultimately, this financial tightening has one purpose — to make United lean enough to compete at the top again. If Amorim delivers Champions League football, these sacrifices will be seen as the turning point. If not, fans will call it austerity with no reward. The message could not be clearer: stop balancing spreadsheets, start winning football matches.