Milan’s move for Zormpas is another sign that Olympiacos’ academy is now scouted differently | OneFootball

Milan’s move for Zormpas is another sign that Olympiacos’ academy is now scouted differently | OneFootball

In partnership with

Yahoo sports
Icon: Thrylos 7 International

Thrylos 7 International

·29 juillet 2026

Milan’s move for Zormpas is another sign that Olympiacos’ academy is now scouted differently

Image de l'article :Milan’s move for Zormpas is another sign that Olympiacos’ academy is now scouted differently
Image de l'article :Milan’s move for Zormpas is another sign that Olympiacos’ academy is now scouted differently

Spyridon Petros Zormpas’ departure will not alter José Luis Mendilibar’s Champions League qualifiers line-up. It may, however, reveal something important about the changing status of Olympiacos’ academy.

AC Milan have officially acquired the 16-year-old centre-back on a permanent basis and placed him within Milan Futuro, their dedicated development structure for players considered capable of progressing toward the senior team.


Vidéos OneFootball


This was not a speculative invitation to a trial. Milan completed a registered transfer for a Greek youth international who had been developing inside Olympiacos’ system.

Zormpas possesses several of the characteristics major European academies increasingly prioritise in young central defenders.

He is already physically imposing for his age at approximately 1.90 metres, but his appeal is unlikely to be based solely on size. Milan Futuro is designed to expose players to a more demanding bridge between academy and senior football, meaning the club will expect him to develop his positioning, distribution and ability to defend larger spaces.

Italian reporting describes him as one of the more notable prospects emerging from Olympiacos’ academy. He has also appeared for Greece’s under-15 and under-16 selections, giving Milan both club and international scouting evidence.

The effect of Olympiacos’ European youth success

Olympiacos’ UEFA Youth League victory in 2024 changed the visibility of its academy.

European clubs no longer need to view young Olympiacos players primarily through domestic youth competition. They have seen them perform against academies from major leagues, in high-pressure knockout matches and within a program capable of producing players for the first team.

That creates opportunity and risk.

The opportunity is reputational. An academy whose players attract Milan, English clubs and other major European organisations becomes more appealing to young Greek talent and can generate transfer income before players reach the senior squad.

The risk is retention. Once foreign clubs begin approaching players at 15 or 16, Olympiacos must persuade families that the clearest path to senior football remains in Piraeus.

Why losing a 16-year-old is difficult to evaluate

Youth transfers cannot be judged with the certainty applied to established professionals.

Zormpas may become a Serie A defender, or he may encounter the development plateaus that affect most highly rated teenagers. Olympiacos are giving up potential rather than known first-team production.

The club’s return also remains unclear. Neither Milan nor Olympiacos have published the fee, compensation structure or whether Olympiacos retained any future economic interest.

Those details will determine whether the move represents:

Without them, claims that Olympiacos either “lost” a major player cheaply or completed excellent business would be premature.

The pathway question

The most important internal question is why Milan’s project was more compelling at this stage.

Milan Futuro gives young players a clearly branded bridge toward professional football. Olympiacos have also demonstrated that academy graduates can reach the senior team, with Konstantinos Tzolakis and Christos Mouzakitis among the strongest recent examples.

But every individual case is different. Position depth, contract conditions, family preference and the player’s perception of future minutes all influence the decision.

Olympiacos must continue making its pathway visible—not only through occasional exceptional graduates, but through a repeatable structure connecting the academy, B team and first team.

What the transfer signifies

Zormpas’ move should not be exaggerated into an immediate first-team loss. He was a youth defender, not part of Mendilibar’s current competitive rotation.

Its significance is broader.

A club of Milan’s stature has now recruited directly from Olympiacos’ academy for a structured long-term project. That is recognition of the talent being developed in Piraeus, but also a warning that international clubs are watching earlier and acting faster.

À propos de Publisher