Analysis: The worrying decline in Liverpool’s pressing numbers | OneFootball

Liverpool Pressing Numbers: A Worrying Decline in Intensity

Liverpool’s identity has long been built on intensity, pressing, and relentless energy. Yet in the latest Anfield Index podcast, Michael Reid and Dave Davis highlight a clear and concerning drop in those very attributes.

Reid addresses the issue directly through the numbers, explaining, “pretty much all these numbers are worse in terms of pressing than Klopp years and even last season.” For a club synonymous with high energy football, that statement alone signals a significant shift.

The concern is not just statistical, it reflects what supporters have been seeing. As Reid puts it, “the eye test tells you… it’s not happening this season.”

Key pressing metrics show sharp Liverpool decline

The drop in pressing efficiency becomes even clearer when breaking down the core metrics. Reid outlines the fall in high turnovers, “that was up at 11.7… down to 7.4. So we’re talking four fewer times per game Liverpool winning the ball high the pitch.”

That reduction directly impacts Liverpool’s ability to create quick chances from regaining possession in advanced areas, once a hallmark of their success.

Pressing sequences also show a steep decline. Reid notes, “20.2… that’s down to 12.5,” meaning opponents are finding it easier to play through Liverpool’s press without disruption.

Perhaps most telling is the change in PPDA. “That peaked… at 8.9… now it’s up at 11.2,” Reid explains. In simple terms, Liverpool are allowing opponents significantly more passes before attempting a defensive action.

Taken together, these metrics paint a consistent picture. Liverpool are pressing less often, less effectively, and with less intensity.

Slot comments contrasted with Liverpool data

The discussion also touches on comments from Arne Slot, who suggested his side consistently outworks opponents. Reid offers some context, defending certain aspects such as possession influencing running data.

However, when it comes to pressing, the disagreement is clear. “He does say that his team press a lot,” Reid notes, before adding pointedly, “I think he’s talking to the wrong fan base here.”

That remark reflects Liverpool supporters’ familiarity with elite pressing. Reid reinforces this by referencing past standards, “we’ve seen our team be the best pressing team arguably in the world.”

Against that benchmark, current levels fall short. “This Liverpool team is a lot more passive this season,” he says, underlining the shift in style and effectiveness.

Photo: IMAGO

Reduced intensity impacting Liverpool performances

The consequences of this decline extend beyond numbers. Pressing is not just a defensive tool, it shapes how Liverpool control games, create chances, and maintain momentum.

Reid summarises the issue succinctly, “the intensity of our press isn’t what it was… that’s for sure.” That drop in intensity links to wider problems, including late goals and reduced attacking cohesion.

There are contextual factors, including possession dominance and squad management, but the underlying trend remains negative. Liverpool are no longer dictating games through pressure in the same way.

In a season filled with inconsistencies, this regression in pressing stands out as one of the most worrying developments. For a team built on intensity, rediscovering that edge may be essential to restoring their competitive level.