Dr. Carlos Iparraguirre: «AFA disputes are settled faster than in court» | OneFootball

Dr. Carlos Iparraguirre: «AFA disputes are settled faster than in court» | OneFootball

In partnership with

Yahoo sports
Icon: Radio Gol

Radio Gol

·1 Juli 2026

Dr. Carlos Iparraguirre: «AFA disputes are settled faster than in court»

Gambar artikel:Dr. Carlos Iparraguirre: «AFA disputes are settled faster than in court»

The AFA Dispute Resolution Chamber is an arbitration tribunal that is being used more and more in Argentine football to resolve financial disputes among the various actors in the sport. According to attorney Carlos Iparraguirre, who spoke with the ADN Gol team, it offers key advantages such as being faster than the ordinary courts, having specialized arbitrators, and offering swift enforceability of awards through the AFA Executive Committee.

In this context, several cases involving financial claims between clubs were mentioned:


Video OneFootball


  1. Argentino de San Carlos vs. San Lorenzo: A successful claim over the Agustín Giay agreement that was resolved in less than a year.
  2. Atlético Tucumán vs. Unión: A lawsuit for $448,000 related to footballer Elías Pereyra (mentioned as Stigarribia).
  3. Unión vs. Racing: Club Unión sued Racing over the cases of players Nardoni and Balboa.

Carlos Iparraguirre on how the Chamber works: “In sport, alternative dispute resolution methods are growing more and more… with efforts to resolve matters not in the courts, but within arbitration tribunals created at the federation level.”

Carlos Iparraguirre on the composition of the panels: “Panels are formed depending on the case… Each party appoints one… and the third is appointed by the Chamber’s Executive Secretariat.”

Carlos Iparraguirre on the advantages of the system: “First, it is faster than court proceedings. Second, those who will decide are specialists in the matter… and the third aspect is enforceability after the decision…”

Carlos Iparraguirre on the time it took to resolve his case: “It took less than a year. Yes, I think the request was made around November 2024, and by October it had been resolved.”

Host of the segment on caps in contracts: “Why does San Lorenzo set a cap of $350,000? It accepts the agreement but says that…” to which Iparraguirre replied: “It is a practice that some professional football clubs have started to introduce… they say that clause was later called the Tevez clause.”

Carlos Iparraguirre on the exclusivity of this route: “If you chose this route… it then carries the weight of a judgment… you accept the conditions of arbitration and you have to respect them.”

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇪🇸 here.

Lihat jejak penerbit