OFI COMPLETE HISTORIC 1–0 WIN AT KARAISKAKIS; ALGUACIL’S DEBUT ENDS IN BOOS | OneFootball

OFI COMPLETE HISTORIC 1–0 WIN AT KARAISKAKIS; ALGUACIL’S DEBUT ENDS IN BOOS | OneFootball

In partnership with

Yahoo sports
Icon: Thrylos 7 International

Thrylos 7 International

·12 September 2026

OFI COMPLETE HISTORIC 1–0 WIN AT KARAISKAKIS; ALGUACIL’S DEBUT ENDS IN BOOS

Article image:OFI COMPLETE HISTORIC 1–0 WIN AT KARAISKAKIS; ALGUACIL’S DEBUT ENDS IN BOOS
Article image:OFI COMPLETE HISTORIC 1–0 WIN AT KARAISKAKIS; ALGUACIL’S DEBUT ENDS IN BOOS

Olympiacos vs OFI, Greek Superleague Matchday 4: Maria Vassilakopoulou/EUROKINISSI

There was a moment during Imanol Alguacil’s first match when the outlines of the new Olympiacos could already be seen. The ball stayed on the grass. The centre-backs were encouraged to find midfield rather than bypass it. Remo Freuler sat underneath the possession structure. Gustavo Puerta moved higher. Olympiacos circulated. They tried to combine. They looked different.


OneFootball Videos


Four days after José Luis Mendilibar left the club, that in itself was remarkable, but football has an inconvenient way of separating style from control. OFI did exactly that.

The visitors left Karaiskakis with a 1–0 victory after Kenan Kodro scored in the 66th minute, handing Alguacil a defeat in his first match as Olympiacos coach. This was not a smash-and-grab performance produced from one isolated chance. OFI had already demonstrated how vulnerable Olympiacos were when possession broke down. Taxiarhis Fountas struck the post in the first half after Stefan Ortega got a touch to his effort. OFI also repeatedly threatened the space behind Olympiacos when the home midfield and fullbacks pushed forward.

That was the central tactical problem.

Olympiacos controlled the ball. OFI controlled the dangerous moments.

This distinction is probably the most important lesson from Alguacil’s debut. Olympiacos had territory. They had possession. They generated crossing opportunities, but genuine high-quality chances were still

scarce.

Puerta’s early effort was comfortable for Nikolaos Christogeorgos. Hormiga González narrowly failed to reach a Tiknizyan delivery. Pirola headed wide. Later, Jota Silva, Gustavo Sá and Yaremchuk all had opportunities, but none forced the equalizer.

OFI, meanwhile, needed fewer attacks to cause greater damage. That tells us where Alguacil’s immediate work lies. The possession structure itself is only the first layer. The next layers are harder: how quickly Olympiacos accelerate once an opponent has been moved, how many players attack the box, where the rest defense is positioned, and how aggressively the nearest players react when possession is lost.

Those relationships take repetition. Olympiacos currently have almost none.

Kodro’s goal was precisely the type Alguacil will hate

The decisive moment arrived in the 66th minute. Athanasiou found Kodro with a diagonal pass and the OFI striker finished powerfully. For Olympiacos, it was not merely a defensive error. It exposed a structural concern.

When a possession-heavy team loses the ball, its protection behind the attack becomes critical. Real Sociedad under Alguacil were excellent at this when functioning properly. The distances between players were compact.

The nearest men counterpressed immediately. The defensive line stepped aggressively. Opponents frequently found themselves unable to exploit the turnover before Sociedad recovered its shape.

Olympiacos are nowhere near that level yet. They could not reasonably be after a couple of training sessions, but that is exactly why this loss matters tactically.

It revealed what the transition toward Alguacil football will cost before the automatisms arrive.

Bailey’s debut was important — but he entered an awkward game

Leon Bailey finally became an Olympiacos player on the pitch. Alguacil introduced him for Fortounis in the 74th minute as part of an increasingly aggressive attempt to rescue the match.

Bailey was not brought into a controlled game where Olympiacos could repeatedly manufacture isolated 1v1s.

He entered while chasing an equalizer against a team increasingly comfortable protecting its advantage, so his debut should not be judged too heavily.

The more interesting test will come once Olympiacos can use him within a settled possession structure: draw the opponent inward, switch the ball, isolate Bailey, then attack the fullback.

That situation never really developed consistently against OFI.

Hormiga González started — but Olympiacos still looked like a team that needs another reference point

González received Alguacil’s first vote of confidence at centre-forward. His movement and pressing energy made tactical sense, but Olympiacos struggled to consistently supply him.

Yaremchuk replaced him in the 67th minute and had the final major chance in stoppage time, heading wide from Gelson Martins’ cross. That will only intensify discussion around the striker market.

The question remains the same: does Olympiacos need another pure finisher, or does Alguacil want a striker capable of improving the collective structure?

After this match, the answer cannot simply be “someone who scores.” The entire attacking mechanism needs more clarity.

Then came the reaction from the stands

The most politically important moment of the evening may not have been Kodro’s goal. It came from the supporters.

After OFI scored, frustration escalated. Around the 80th minute, sections of the Karaiskakis crowd began chanting José Luis Mendilibar’s name. They did it again later and when the final whistle arrived, loud boos greeted the Olympiacos players.

It does not mean supporters have already turned on Alguacil. The chant was much more obviously a message about the decision to remove Mendilibar and it creates an unusually difficult environment for the new coach.

He has inherited a team whose previous manager remains emotionally popular and his first result was a home defeat.

That makes Wednesday’s Europa League match against Jagiellonia immediately more important.

Alguacil did exactly the right thing afterward

The Basque coach could easily have protected himself. He could have pointed out that he had barely trained the team. He could have blamed the transition. He could have reminded everyone that OFI entered in good form. He refused.

“There are no excuses,” was the substance of his response. Alguacil acknowledged the limited time but said Olympiacos have a strong squad and that it would not be dignified for the coach of such a large club to use preparation time as an excuse. He also said he understood the supporters’ anger and would keep working until they could be proud of the team.

After all this is now his problem. Not Mendilibar’s. Not the schedule’s. Not the transfer market’s. Alguacil has been given an extremely talented Olympiacos squad and a difficult transition.

The first match showed both sides of that equation. You could already see the football he wants. You could also see how far away the team still is from playing it properly and now Europe arrives in four days.

View publisher imprint