The Celtic Star
·20 novembre 2025
Celtic fans organise, unify, and refuse to be distracted

In partnership with
Yahoo sportsThe Celtic Star
·20 novembre 2025


Celtic supporters shows their support at full-time following the team’s victory in the Scottish Gas Scottish Cup Semi Final match between St Johnstone and Celtic at Hampden Park on April 20, 2025. (Photo by Ian MacNicol/Getty Images)
The club’s message, released just days before the most contentious AGM in years, framed the upcoming Safety Advisory Group meeting as a matter of pure safety and compliance. But the Green Brigade’s counter-statement has thrown a fresh spotlight on what is increasingly viewed as a political manoeuvre dressed up in the language of risk management.

Celtic supporters shows their support at full-time following the team’s victory in the Scottish Gas Scottish Cup Semi Final match between St Johnstone and Celtic at Hampden Park on April 20, 2025. (Photo by Ian MacNicol/Getty Images)
The ultras group, already at the centre of a six-game ban that many supporters see as collective punishment without due process, now believe the SAG meeting may lead to something far more severe, a full or partial closure of the entire standing section for the rest of the season. And they believe the club is using the SAG to launder a pre-decided outcome.
In their own words –
According to the Green Brigade, they attempted to ensure supporters had a voice in that room. Their request was rejected.
It’s a fierce accusation, and one that lands at a moment when trust between supporters and the club has all but evaporated.

Celtic supporters at Fir Park, photo by Vagelis Georgariou
The Green Brigade again challenge the club’s recent communications, particularly Celtic’s choice to state criminal allegations as proven.
That line — “without due process” — is quickly becoming the defining fault line in this entire dispute.
The club insists safety obligations require swift, decisive action. Supporters insist basic fairness requires evidence, dialogue, and proportionality. Right now, neither side is willing to accept the other’s framework.

Celtic Supporters at Hampden Park during the 2024 Scottish Cup Final between Celtic and theRangers. Photo Vagelis Georgariou for The Celtic Star
The Green Brigade go further, suggesting the SAG meeting is merely a rubber-stamp exercise.
This cuts directly to the suspicion many supporters now hold, that the Green Brigade ban, and now potentially wider sanctions, are being driven less by safety concerns and more by the political context surrounding the club.
Perhaps the most explosive part of the statement is the claim that Celtic have threatened wider sanctions on the entire standing section if the ban is not respected.

Celtic Supporters at Hampden Park during the 2024 Scottish Cup Final between Celtic and theRangers. Photo Vagelis Georgariou for The Celtic Star
If true, this places Celtic in a very uncomfortable light. Punishing individuals? Supporters understand that. Punishing an entire stand — hundreds of innocent supporters — because some refused to accept guilt without process? That is something entirely different.

Celtic supporters heading to Hampden last May for the Scottish Cup Final. Photo Big Lens.
The Green Brigade’s final paragraphs land with the weight of accumulated years of mistrust.
This is critical. The group are openly stating they have attempted to talk, as they have throughout this process. They are openly stating Celtic have not responded, and they are openly stating that this silence is worsening the situation.
This is in contrast to Celtic’s own narrative that the Green Brigade “refuse to comply.”

Celtic supporters at Fir Park, photo by Vagelis Georgariou
The SAG meeting will decide more than just operational matters. If further sanctions emerge — particularly on the standing section as a whole — Celtic will insist they came from an independent body. The Green Brigade will insist the club engineered it. Supporters will decide who they believe.
At an AGM already shaping up to be the most hostile in two decades, Celtic look like a board trying to manage public perceptions before shareholders enter the room. The timing has not gone unnoticed. The Trust have accused the club of distraction tactics. The Collective have been hammering the board’s lack of accountability. The North Curve have openly blamed Dermot Desmond for the ban.
Support is mobilised. Shareholders are prepared. Every NED is under scrutiny. And the dominant shareholder himself is now the subject of organised fan pressure.

Celtic supporters in festive spirits at Tannadice, Dundee Utd v Celtic, Sunday 22 December 2024. Photo Vagelis Georgariou (The Celtic Star)
This is the most politically volatile Celtic AGM in years.
A sudden pivot to a “safety crisis” — conveniently centred on a group already demonised by some — would neatly narrow the focus of questioning. It would allow the board to frame the day’s agenda around supporter behaviour rather than corporate governance, direction of travel, or performance.
If this is the club’s strategy, it is as transparent as it is cynical. If the club intended to break the momentum of the Celtic Fans Collective, they have instead energised it. If they hoped the Green Brigade ban would divide supporters, the opposite has happened. If they thought the timing of statements and sanctions would quieten dissent before the AGM, the noise has only grown louder. And if they believed they could run Celtic in the shadows indefinitely, they are now discovering what happens when supporters organise, unify, and refuse to be distracted.
Today’s SAG meeting matters. Friday’s AGM matters even more. But what matters most is that trust is all but gone, and once lost, it is rarely recovered.
Niall J
Celtic in the Thirties, Vol 1. published by Celtic Star Books, Click on image to order from Celticstarbooks.com
Celtic in the Thirties, Vol 1. published by Celtic Star Books, click on the image to order from Celticstarbooks.com
More Stories / Latest News









































