Defence clarifies: Casillas did not receive €1.5m from insurer | OneFootball

The legal defense of former FC Porto goalkeeper Iker Casillas clarified this Thursday that the insurer Fidelidade did not pay any compensation or benefit to the former footballer following the acute myocardial infarction he suffered in May 2019.

In a statement sent to the Lusa news agency, Casillas’ legal representatives explain that Fidelidade considered that the heart attack suffered by the then FC Porto player on May 1, 2019, “did not constitute a workplace accident,” which is why it made no payment under the corresponding compensation scheme, or on any other grounds.

The defense adds that the amount of 1.5 million euros (ME) mentioned in the case, which has been ongoing since October 2021 in Porto Labour Court, corresponds to the annual salary reported by FC Porto to the insurer for the purpose of defining contractual liability.

The lawyers stress that this amount “in no way means that it was transferred by Fidelidade to Mr. Iker Casillas,” since that would imply recognition of the existence of a workplace accident, which is precisely the issue being examined in court.

The clarification comes at a time when the trial continues in the lawsuit in which the former Spain international wants the heart attack he suffered during an FC Porto training session to be classified as a workplace accident.

According to the initial claim, Casillas is demanding that Fidelidade pay 750,821.91 euros for total temporary incapacity and 1,521,780.82 euros for permanent total incapacity for his usual work (IPATH), amounts calculated on the basis of the annual salary of 1.5 million euros reported by FC Porto to the insurer.

The former goalkeeper is also demanding that FC Porto assume the portion of the compensation that he believes is not covered by the insurance contract, seeking an additional payment of 491,570.32 euros relating to total temporary incapacity and 996,324.50 euros relating to IPATH.

In addition to these amounts, he is also seeking payment of future medical and pharmaceutical expenses associated with the after-effects of the heart attack, as well as the redemption capital of the annual pension to be set by the court.

At the second hearing of the trial, held on Monday, cardiologist Natália António, an expert appointed by the Medico-Legal Council at the time the expert report was prepared, stated that the training session carried out by Casillas on the morning of the heart attack was intense enough to have acted as a triggering factor for the rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque, but rejected the idea that it was the main cause of the cardiac episode.

According to the specialist, the origin of the heart attack was a pre-existing coronary atherosclerotic disease, while still acknowledging that physical exertion may have acted as the “trigger” for the episode.

The expert also explained that an immediate temporal coincidence between physical exertion and plaque rupture is not necessary, and that there may be an interval between the two.

She also added that, after the heart attack, Casillas moved from a low cardiovascular risk situation to a very high-risk one, considering that he is not fit to return to elite competition.

The doctor also stated that the disease entails a greater risk of arrhythmias, an increased likelihood of sudden death, and functional limitations.

According to Público newspaper, at the first hearing of the trial, held on June 8, Casillas said he began to feel unwell during an FC Porto training session, describing chest pain, difficulty breathing, and intense fatigue before being taken to hospital, where he underwent catheterization to unblock a coronary artery.

According to the former Spain international, the heart attack ended his professional career and left him with permanent limitations. “I can’t run, I can manage about 20 or 50 metres. No more than that,” he said in court at the time.

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇵🇹 here.