![Icon: Anfield Index](https://image-service.onefootball.com/transform?w=96&dpr=2&image=https://filebucket.onefootball.com/2019/11/1574083488919-14_Anfielwatch.png)
Anfield Index
·13 de fevereiro de 2025
Refereeing Controversy Dominates Discussion After Liverpool’s Derby Stalemate
![Imagem do artigo:Refereeing Controversy Dominates Discussion After Liverpool’s Derby Stalemate](https://image-service.onefootball.com/transform?w=280&h=210&dpr=2&image=https%3A%2F%2Fanfieldindex.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F02%2Fimago1058788581-scaled.jpg)
In partnership with
Yahoo sportsAnfield Index
·13 de fevereiro de 2025
The Merseyside Derby is often defined by its intensity and unpredictability, and the recent 2-2 draw at Goodison Park was no different. However, beyond the goals and tactical battles, the performance of referee Michael Oliver became a focal point of discussion. In the latest episode of Media Matters on Anfield Index, Eddie Gibbs and Liverpool FC reporter David Lynch broke down the key officiating decisions that shaped the game’s narrative.
“Stripping all the emotion away… there’ll be some Liverpool supporters very frustrated,” said David Lynch, highlighting the discontent surrounding Oliver’s decision-making on the night. Liverpool’s players and fans alike questioned several pivotal calls, particularly around the physical approach Everton adopted. Lynch noted how “Everton were clever in how they pushed the boundaries,” often escaping punishment for what many considered borderline challenges.
One incident, in particular, stood out: a contentious foul in the penalty area that was waved away without a VAR intervention. Lynch remarked, “It looked like a clear coming together, and you’d expect at least a second look,” echoing the disbelief many Liverpool supporters expressed post-match.
Oliver is one of the Premier League’s most experienced officials, yet Lynch suggested that consistency remains a concern. “It’s the inconsistency that frustrates people more than the decisions themselves,” he explained. Throughout the game, Liverpool’s players were repeatedly penalised for similar challenges that went unpunished when roles were reversed.
Gibbs and Lynch discussed the difficulty of refereeing a high-stakes derby but questioned whether Oliver’s leniency gave Everton an advantage. “In a game like this, if you let too much go early on, it sets the tone for the rest of the match,” Lynch said, pointing to Everton’s aggressive pressing as a tactic that thrived within the referee’s interpretation of events.
The Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system was another point of contention. Despite several controversial incidents, VAR remained conspicuously silent. “There were moments when you expected the game to be stopped, and it just didn’t happen,” Lynch observed. This non-intervention left Liverpool fans questioning the technology’s purpose when such tight, potentially game-changing moments went unchecked.
Refereeing decisions don’t just influence the scoreline—they also shape the psychological ebb and flow of a match. Lynch described how Liverpool’s players appeared increasingly frustrated as the game progressed. “You could see them appealing more and more as the game went on,” he said, suggesting that the perceived imbalance in decisions impacted their composure during key moments.
As Liverpool continues to adapt to life under Arne Slot, games like this underscore the importance of mental resilience. “The players have to accept that decisions won’t always go their way,” Lynch said. But for supporters, the lingering frustration with Oliver’s performance won’t be easily forgotten.
The Merseyside Derby delivered its usual quota of drama, but this time, Michael Oliver was as much a talking point as the action on the pitch.